РефератыИностранный языкAbAbortion Clinics Should Not Be Closed Essay

Abortion Clinics Should Not Be Closed Essay

, Research Paper


In 1973, the Supreme Court?s decision made


it possible for women to get safe, legal abortions from well-trained medical


surgeons, and therefore led to dramatic decreases in pregnancy-related


injury and death (”abortion”). Now there is a new proposal to close abortion


clinics. This proposal takes away the privacy rights of American women


that are guaranteed by our Constitution. By closing abortion clinics the


government is not only taking away women?s rights, but is also punishing


those whom want to exercise their right of a pro-choice woman.


Abortion clinics allow thousands of women


every year to have abortions. Having the abortion should be woman?s personal


choice. By closing these clinics, there will be no providers to perform


the operation, so the choice has already been made for them. Closing the


clinics will increase the barriers of having an abortion. When there are


too many obstacles, the right to make their own choice is taken away from


them. In 1973 the American Supreme Court ruled that Americans? right to


privacy included: “the right of a woman to decide whether to have children,


and the right of a woman and her doctor to make that decision without state


interference” (”abortion”). The Constitution says we have a right to privacy,


so taking away a woman?s chance to make decisions about her own body violates


that right.


The American Civil Liberties Union defends


the Constitution and peoples? rights.ACLU has protected the rights of abortion


for women, and in recent years has argued mayor cases opposing restrictions


that deny woman access to reproductive health care (”ACLU”). Policy 263


states: “The ACLU holds that every woman, as a matter of her right to the


enjoyment of life, liberty, and privacy, should be free to determine whether


and when to bear children.”(The American Civil Liberties Union)


The closure of abortion clinics will be


done with the purpose to reduce the number of abortions. This raises the


question whether this will be an effective method or not. Before 1973 abortions


were illegal yet the number of women who sought abortions did not decrease


(”abortion”). Before 1973 many thousands of women died or suffered serious


medical problems after attempting to perform their own abortions, or going


to untrained doctors who performed cheap abortions with uncivilized methods


or in unsanitary conditions (The Abortion Law Homepage.). If clinics are


closed, women will still continue to attempt, and succeed, in ending unwanted


pregnancies just like before 1973. Women will risk their health and possibly


even their lives. By keeping these abortions clinics open it ensures a


higher probability that the women who do have abortions will be in a safe,


sanitary environment, and therefore injuries will be fewer in number.


If clinics are shut, the waiting lists


of abortion clinics in other countries will be much longer. Women will


have to wait longer to get an abortion, and will be treated later in their


pregnancy which is much more dangerous for the pregnant women.


Pro-life activists claim that the unborn


baby is alive and has feelings when the heart begins beating. But, the


heartbeat begins between the eighteenth and twenty-fifth day (”Fetus”).


They also say that women who have abortions are “murderers”. This problem


could be solved by keeping abortion clinics open, because then the woman


can be treated before the twenty fifth day when the fetus is not yet a


living baby. She will not have to wait because of long waiting lists, but


instead will have the abortion as soon as possible with as less psychological

r />

pain.


If a woman has to travel to another country


to have a legal abortion, she will have to pay more money. She will now


not only have to pay for the abortion itself, but also the traveling costs


and that does not include the psychological costs as well. Not all people


can afford these costs. So by keeping clinics open more women will have


the chance to exercise their right and have their desired abortion. If


a working woman or student suddenly has to leave the country, this means


she will have to think of excuses and lies for an explanation. This is


not fair to the woman, she should not have to explain herself to anyone,


it is her body and therefore she can do what she wants, she does not need


other people?s consult.


Abortion clinics are not a “butcher?s place”


where young babies are murdered. They provide a choice for women whether


or not to bring a child into this world.


What is worse: taking away the life of


an unborn child that is not even aware of life itself yet, or a mother


bringing an unwanted child into this world, knowing that she will not be


able to take care of it, and that her child will have to suffer from the


poor circumstances in which she lives. As of now the woman has the ability


to make that choice and save the child from poor, possibly abusive or hate


filled environment. Personally I feel that living in a circumstance such


as abuse is worse than the abortion of the fetus. Rape victims should also


be able to have an abortion because they know that if they were to keep


the child, they would cringe when she thought about whom contributed to


the other half of the child. The offspring will be a painful reminder to


the rape victim. She did not choose to take the responsibility of a child


and therefore should not have to pay the consequences. A woman who cannot


love her child has no right to have a baby in the first place.


One option for women who are not able to


take care of their baby is adoption. Yet she will have to carry the baby


for nine months and then give it up. Not all women are able to do this


physically or psychologically. After the pregnancy she will have to hope


that their baby will find a good and loving home. And this is not always


the case. The child will possibly have to suffer from living in orphanages


waiting to get adopted. Adoption can not always be seen as a good solution


to unwanted pregnancies.


The advantage of closing abortion clinics


could be that woman will be forced to take the responsibility over their


baby, and give their unborn child the right to life. But it can not be


seen as something entirely positive. The mother will always regard the


child as a “mistake” and will never love it the way she would have if she


had wanted to keep the child. Getting an abortion does not always mean


that the woman is only thinking of herself, she also thinks on behalf of


her baby. Abortion clinics do not make the choice easier, nor do they force


the woman into the surgery. People who are against abortion having the


choice not to have one. It is not fair to take away the choice of people


who do want one.


List of works consulted:


“Abortion.” Encarta Encyclopedia 1999.


1999 ed.


“ACLU.” Encarta Encyclopedia 1999. 1999


ed.


“Fetus.” Encarta Encyclopedia 1999. 1999


ed.


The Abortion Law Homepage. “Abortion Law


Homepage”. 24 November 1996. (11 March 2000). http://members.aol.com/abtrbng/index.htm


The American Civil Liberties Union. “Abortion


Clinic Access Law”. 1997. (11 March 2000). http://www.aclu.org/library/aaabort.html

Сохранить в соц. сетях:
Обсуждение:
comments powered by Disqus

Название реферата: Abortion Clinics Should Not Be Closed Essay

Слов:1331
Символов:8661
Размер:16.92 Кб.