РефератыИностранный языкFoForgiveness Essay Research Paper Forgiveness

Forgiveness Essay Research Paper Forgiveness

Forgiveness Essay, Research Paper


Forgiveness


Christ Jesus some two thousand years ago came into this world to bring


redemption for our sins. He did this through his death and resurrection, or what


we refer to as the pascal mystery. We still encounter the saving presence of the


Lord in the sacraments and in the Word. In each and every sacrament we come face


to face with “the grace of God our Savior” (Titus 2:11). It is this redemption


of sins aspect of the sacraments that I will be examine. In the past couple of


century we have focused are attention primarily on the Sacrament of Penance as


the means to obtain forgiveness of sins after Baptism. We have come to focus on


it so much that it has come to be, for most Catholics, understood as the only


sacrament though which forgiveness of sins is obtained. This belief as we will


see is an incorrect understanding because we encounter the saving presence of


the Lord in other sacraments and ways not only in the Sacrament of Penance.


However the Sacrament of Penance is always to be understood as the primary


sacrament for forgiveness of mortal sins after Baptism.


To better understand how this can be let us first look at the general


background of the development of the Sacrament of Penance. The Sacrament of


Penance has it’s roots even as far back as the day of resurrection when Christ


breathed out the spirit on the disciples and said to them, ‘Receive the Holy


Spirit. If you forgive anyone’s sins, they are forgiven; if you retain anyone’s


sins, they are retained.’ (John 20:22-23). In Paul’s second letter to the


Corinthians we see Paul developing this teaching of Christ, when he says ‘All


this is from God, who through Christ reconciled us to himself and gave us the


ministry of reconciliation; that is, God was in Christ reconciling the world to


himself, not counting their trespasses against them, and entrusting to us the


message of reconciliation. So we are ambassadors for Christ, God making his


appeal through us. We beseech you…be reconciled to God. For our sake he made


him to be sin who knew no sin, so that in him we might become the righteousness


of God( 2 Cor. 5:18-21). These two passages would seem to be part of the


sacrament’s biblical foundation. The sacrament itself would seem to have come


about as a result of the early Church’s struggle to recognize that Baptism may


forgive sin but it didn’t end the struggle against sin. People fell into sin


even after Baptism, so in order to bring these fallen members back into the


Christian community the Sacrament of Penance was established.


In the second and up to the sixth century A.D. a Christian could only


receive the Sacrament of Penance once after Baptism. The penitent would have to


first confess before his or her bishop. The penitent would then be required to


participate in the “order of penitents” of the early Church. This required the


penitent to wear special clothes, and the penitent would have to go to a special


place with other penitents when worshipping with the community. The community


would pray for those in the “order of penitents” during the worship serves, and


the bishop would lay his hands on the penitents. But this laying on of hands did


not take on the character of absolution until it was done during the worship


serves on Thursday of Holy Week. The penitents were not allowed to receive


Eucharist because the penitents were excommunicated, excluded from Communion.


After a period of probation, prescribed by the bishop, the penitent would be


absolved of the sins the individual committed. The bishop would do this by


laying his hands on the penitent. The typical time for this reconciliation to


take place was on Thursday of Holy Week before the Baptisms took place. The


reason it was done at this time was because the early Church believed that both


Baptism and Penance were both sacraments that brought about forgiveness of sins


and that they should be prepared for at the same time. It was just this type of


thinking that also led the early Church to the belief that the sacrament could


only be received once. This time of preparation, for the Sacrament of


Reconciliation, has come to be what we refer to now as the liturgical season of


Lent. This belief that the sacrament could only be received once and due to the


strict penance received for sins it became customary among Christians of these


earlier centuries to wait to receive the Sacrament of Reconciliation until just


before death. The early Church only saw public confession necessary if you had


committed the sins of murder, apostasy, or adultery. Sense confession was only


necessary in the case of these three serious sins, which were serious acts


against the Christian community, and do to its connections with Baptism on


Thursday of Holy Week it was viewed as a part of public worship. It was


considered part of public worship up to the end of the sixth century A.D. and


the beginning of the seventh century A.D. at which time a transition took place


in the Sacrament of Reconciliation.


Due to the severity of the penance imposed on people for sins committed,


and the belief in being only allowed to receive the Sacrament of Reconciliation


once. People avoided the public canonical penance till the end of their lives.


This caused a decline in the public penance to the point of almost total


extinction towards the end of the sixth century A.D. Another transition was


taking place in the Sacrament of Baptism about this same time that also raised


question of concern in regards to the Sacrament of Reconciliation. During the


fifth and sixth centuries A.D. there was a larger number of adult converts


accepted into the Christian community that lacked proper instruction and


catechizes. This occurred do to the fact that it was customary to join the


religion that the leader of a society was part of, so if the leader of the


society was Christian all those who followed that individual would become


Christian. This resulted in a large numbers of adult Baptisms. But at the end


of the sixth centuryA.D. and beginning of the seventh century A.D. the Church’s


baptismal policy changed. The Church started to emphasize infant Baptism rather


them adult Baptism. This change in emphasis to infant baptism and the decline in


the number of people participating in the public canonical penance presented


some new pastoral problems that needed to be addressed. First, how could the


Church maintain its high moral standards, and at the same time, present to those


members of the Church that fell into sin the ability to be reconciled based on a


more realistic program? Second, it was one thing to require those Baptized as


adult to do public penance. But it would be a whole deferent thing to ask those


Baptized as infants and young children, who had to still live and struggle


through all the stages of growth prior to adulthood, to do the same public


penance and only be allowed to do it once.


To address these issues a new form of penance emerged in the seventh


century A.D., which is often referred to as “private” or “tariff” penance by


scholars. It was referred to as “tariff” penance because a priest would assign


penance to individuals who confessed their sins in private from a collection of


handbooks called a Penitential Books. Penitential Books were handbooks that


listed sins and customary penances, which was usually some period of fasting,


that were given by other priests for the particular sin listed. This new form of


private or tariff penance was deferent from the earlier, and still practiced,


form of public canonical penance. It was different in that the whole rite was


done in privately and by a priest rather then the bishop. Private penance could


also be received as many times as one felt the need for it. These three new


characteristic of privacy, priest as presider, and the ability to receive the


Sacrament of Reconciliation more then once addressed the pastoral issues that


had emerged at the end of the sixth century A.D. This made the new rite popular


among the Christian community.


It seems to be a consensus among scholars that tariff penance has its


origins in the British Isles, most scholars would say primarily in Ireland. They


also belief that monk-missionaries are responsible for tariff penance making its


way on to the European continent between the years 543 A.D. and 615 A.D. After


it had arrived on the European continent, the tariff penance the monks had


brought was modified because some of the penances given in the Penitential Books


appeared to be to harsh. This need to reduce the harshness of the penance gave


birth to a system called “commutation.” Commutation is a system by which the

p>

harshness of the penance given for a sin was reduced or commuted. Several types


of this commutation system emerged, but it was easy for the unjust priest to


manipulate this system to benefit themselves. In some cases the penitent would


be forced to give an offering to the priest for the purpose of celebrating Mass


for the penitent’s forgiveness, but some priests found this to be more of a


profitable enterprise rather then that of an acceptable penance. There were


other abuses of the commutation system, but all such abuses were condemned by


the Church. It eventually became the norm of the Church that the fasting that


was imposed by the Penitential Books was to be replaced by prayers. Another form


of penance that was replaced by prayers was that of public penance. The public


canonical penance emphasized the public nature of sin, and the penance given for


sins was of a public nature. The penitent would be required to do such things as


visit and take care of the poor, sick, and imprisoned. Private penance on the


other hand accepted the penitent’s confession as satisfactory for forgiveness of


sins with the stipulation that the penitent do the prayers given as penance.


This emphasis on prayer rather then fasting and public penance made private


penance even more popular among Christians. Private penance eventually won out


over all the other forms of reconciliation in the Western Church. The Church


began to recognize this and in 1215 the Fourth Lateran Council made it a


requirement that all Catholics at “the age of discretion” must confess their


serious sins to a priest once a year and attained the Eucharistic liturgy and


receive the Eucharist during the Easter season. We can see that private penance,


due to its popularity and from this mandate made by the Fourth Lateran Council,


by the thirteenth century had all but replaced the other forms of reconciliation


found in the earlier centuries of Christianity. The Catholic Church also during


the Reformation of the sixteenth century defended private penance against


reformers who believed that private penance was not necessary for the


forgiveness of sins. The Council of Trent, in 1551, stated that ‘private


confession was absolutely necessary for mortal sins, which had to be confessed


to a qualified priest according to number, type, and special circumstance. Trent


also made it clear that the Sacrament of Penance was necessary for the salvation


of persons who sinned seriously after Baptism.’ The standards set by the Fourth


Lateran Council and the Council of Trent have been restated time and again by


official Church documents up to the present day.


Reconciliation was never meant to be solely attached only to the


Sacrament of Penance. We find forgiveness anytime we encounter the saving


presence of the Lord in other sacraments and ways not only in the Sacrament of


Penance. One way of showing the truth of this statement is to look at the role


that Lord’s Prayer plays in different liturgical rites. St. Augustine shows that


he holds this point of view himself when he says “The remission of sin takes


place not solely in the sacred ablution of Baptism, but in the daily recitation


of the Lord’s Prayer. In it you have, as it were, your daily baptism.” Most


scholars believe that during the first six centuries of Christianity daily


faults and sins were believed to be forgiven by the devotional practices and


prayer, most importantly the Our Father. Because the only sins that called for


public canonical penance were those of murder, apostasy, or adultery. The Lord’s


Prayer was an important part of worship in the early Church, and still is today.


It was so important that the candidates for Baptism had to recite the prayer


before they received Baptism. The Our Father was also recited by the priest or


bishop in public penance for the sake of all, and the one to be annoited also


had to recite it before the annoiting took place. The early Church, I dare say,


believed that all the sacraments were sacraments of reconciliation, of which the


Lord’s Prayer was the “perfect verbal expression.”


The Liturgy of the Hours is also a source of reconciliation because it


ends with the Our Father. St. Benedict himself emphasizes, in his Rule, that at


morning and evening prayer the Lord’s Prayer is to be said aloud so all the


monks may here the phrase “forgive us as we forgive.” He emphasized this so


that there might be perfect reconciliation between the monks each evening and


morning.


The Our Father is also found in the Liturgy of the Eucharist which is


the ultimate expression of reconciliation in itself because it is the ultimate


expression of the pascal mystery. The Lord’s Prayer has always held a climatic


role in the Eucharist. It has always been the introduction to communion in the


Eucharistic Liturgy. One reason given for it being the introduction to communion


was the petition “forgive us as we forgive.” St.Augustine says the reason we


pray the Lord’s Prayer at this point is so that “after these words ‘forgive us


as we forgive’ we may approach the alter confidently and literally ‘with washed


faces.” What St. Augustine meant by this is that the Our Father makes it


possible for Christians to receive the Eucharist because they had in a spiritual


sense “washed their faces” of sin.


The Liturgy of the Eucharist is itself another expression of


reconciliation The place in the Eucharistic Liturgy that forgiveness is most


apparent is in the preparation to receive communion. The preparation consists of


the Our Father, the prayer that follows, “Deliver us, O Lord from every


evil…,” then the prayer for peace, “Lord Jesus Christ, you said to your


apostles, I leave you peace…,” and finally the private prayers said by the


priest. This small group of prayers combined with the acclamation “Lamb of God”


is in itself a penitential rite. This penitential rite emphasizes the


forgiveness offered to all in the Eucharist. If we take a closer look at these


prayers, we can see how they emphasize the power of forgiveness found in the


Body and Blood of Christ. Lets take for an example one of the private prayers


recited by the priest just before communion is distributed to the faithful, ”


Lord Jesus Christ, Son of the living God, by the will of the father and the work


of the Holy Spirit, your death brought life to the world. By your holy Body and


Blood free me from all my sins and from every evil…..” This private prayer of


the priest is putting emphasize on the fact that it is the Body and Blood of


Christ Jesus that frees us from our sins. It would seem then that by receiving


the body and blood of Christ we are also receiving forgiveness.


We can see by looking at Church history that the Sacrament of Penance


was primarily for the forgiveness of mortal sins. We can also easily see how


forgiveness is offered to us in other sacraments and ways, such as in prayers


like the Our Father. Based on these two facts, and many not mentioned, I would


have to say that it is incorrect to say that after Baptism we can only obtain


forgiveness of sins through the Sacrament of Reconciliation. Because we can see


how this other sacraments and ways enable us to encounter the saving presence of


the Lord. We should always understand the Sacrament of Penance as the primary


sacrament for forgiveness of mortal sins after Baptism. Because history shows us


that these sins are sins that damage more then just the one sinning and demand a


form of reconciliation that reconciles the sinner with the whole Body of Christ,


the Church. It would seem to me sense the early Church did not see all sins as


needing the Sacrament of Penance there is no reason not to belief that venial


sins are forgiven in other sacraments and rituals. We even have proof that


saints such as St. Benedict and St. Augustine held that we could find


forgiveness in other ways then just that of the Sacrament of Reconciliation.


Bibliography


Dudley, Martin: Confession and Absolution: 1990, The Liturgical Press (243.4,


D848).


Hamelin, Leonce: Reconciliation in the Church: 1980, The Liturgical Press (243.4,


H213).


Jeep, Elizabeth: The Rite of Penance: Commentaries Volume Two, Implementing the


Rite: 1976, The Liturgical Conference (243.4, L782r v.2).


Keifer, Ralph: The Rite of Penance: Commentaries Volume One, Understanding the


Document: 1975, The Liturgical Conference (243.4, L782r v.1).


Longley, Alfred: Healing and Forgiveness, A New Penitential: 1976, World Library


Publications Inc. (243.4, L856)


Mitchell, Nathan, OSB: The Rite of Penance: Commentaries Volume Three,


Background and Directions: 1978, The Liturgical Conference (243.4, L782r v.3).

Сохранить в соц. сетях:
Обсуждение:
comments powered by Disqus

Название реферата: Forgiveness Essay Research Paper Forgiveness

Слов:3179
Символов:20504
Размер:40.05 Кб.