РефератыИностранный языкChChivalry Essay Research Paper Chilvalry is the

Chivalry Essay Research Paper Chilvalry is the

Chivalry Essay, Research Paper


Chilvalry is the most significant concept throughout history. Chivalry, in its


formal code, came to exist in the Middle Ages around the 12th century. It is


not clear as to whether the Romans, the Franks, or the Germans gave rise to


chivalry, but each culture brought the seeds of conduct with them. The


formal code was based on knightly conduct, with special emphasis on the


courtly manners towards women. Chivalry was such an important aspect of


morality that the church became heavily involved. The church used the code


of chivalry to reshape the idea of the social warrior. In doing this, the church


wanted citizens to identify with virtue, military excellence with courtesy, a


sense of justice, piety, and honor.(Ventura, pg. 46) People familiar with


King Arthur and the Knights of the Round Table know that a chivalrous act


usually involved someone, usually a damsel in distress and a brave knight


who comes to the rescue. For the sake of arguing, we need to establish our


definition of chivalry. ?Our reparative definitions are as follows: Chivalry-


the qualifications of the ideal knight. Dead- extinguished no longer existing.


Our Stipulative definitions are the following: Chivalry-for our purposes,


chivalry are the characteristics of a person who follows and believes in the


principles of the Chivalric Code. Dead-no longer occurring Chivalric Code:


I. Live to serve king and country. II. Live one’s life so that it is worthy of


respect and honor. III. Live for freedom, justice and all that is good. IV.


Choose death before dishonor. V. Never attack an unarmed foe. VI. Avoid


lying to your fellow man VII. Administer justice. VIII. Defend the week and


innocent. IX. Destroy evil in all of its monstrous forms. X. Show Respect to


authority. XI. Exhibit manners. XII. Do not allow anger to blind you, a cool


head will win the day. XIII. Exhibit courage in word and deed. XIV. Never


abandon a friend, ally,


or noble cause. XV. Never betray a confidence or comrade. XVI. Remain


loyal to one’s friends and those who lay their trust in thee. XVII. Fight with


honor. XVIII. Die with honor.?(Berger,pg.28) The code of honor that


chilvarly made people live by left a cultural tradition to be carried out many


hundreds of years.


Today, morality and ethics are rare commodities. One could generalize


these principles down to everyday situations, but even then, one would find


that the majority of people just don’t live by this code. Today, the majority of


people just do not hold these values true to their hearts. And it should be


clarified that just because you hold a door open, or pick up books for a


female you are not chivalrous. Chivalry is code that one must live their life


by, not simply picking and choosing a few to follow. For example, schools


no longer teach morality; but religion is able to reach only a few and families


are often broken. We see the results of this problem nightly on the television,


news, and in dailypapers.


Nobody in the world will do the right thing every single time. We are


going to pick for aspects of the chivalric code and demonstrate how they no


longer exist. Argument #1 Deductive Reasoning For our purposes cheating


will be defined as obtaining an unfair advantage to benefit oneself. It has


been shown through research that cheating is a common occurrence at all


college campuses. Of 68 people that were polled at Cal Poly 80% (or 54


people) admitted that they have cheated at one time or another. Cheating is a


direct violation of the Chivalric Code. P1 Cheating is obtaining an unfair


advantage to benefit oneself. P2 Cheating is a common occurrence at all


college campuses. P3 80% of Cal Poly students admitted to cheating at one


time or another. P4 Cheating is a violation of the Chivalric Code. Therefore,


C Chivalry is dead. A.R.G. Conditions Acceptability: Premise 1 is cogent


because it is a definition and not an arguable statement (common


knowledge). Premise 2 is acceptable because it is not easy to refute and gives


no evidence of not being acceptable. Premise 3 is a different case. It is


acceptable under the proper testimony clause. The premise is a fact from a


poll taken at Cal Poly and there is no reason to doubt the fact that the results


are true. Premise 4 is true by simple logic. Premise 5 is defended by the rest


of the argument and is therefore acceptable. Relevance: Relevance is also


evident in this argument. Premise 1 clearly defines the ambiguous term of


cheating for premise 2. Premise three is a proof of premise 2. It gives a


specific example to the broad statement made in premise 2. Premise 4 is


definitely relevant. Premise five is not relevant to premise 3 or 4 but is


relevant to premise 1 and 2. Grounds: This argument meets the G condition


because all the premises are true and relevant to themselves and support the


conclusion. Counter Argument P1 For this purpose we will define cheating


as directly copying someone’s work. P2 Cheating is not a common


occurrence in college classrooms. P3 Of the 68 people polled at Cal Poly


only 19 of them admitted copying off a neighbor’s work. P4 19 of 68 is less


than 51% that is needed to prove a majority. P5 Some people will always


defy the Chivalric Code but a majority is needed to prove the code is


nonexistent. Therefore, C Chivalry is not dead A.R.G. Conditions


Acceptability: Premise 1 is a stipulative definition and can not be argued.


Premise 2 uses the stipulative definition of premise 1 and makes a general


statement. This premise is accepted provisionally based on the fact that the


other premises aim to prove that statement true. Premise 3 is yet another fact


that can not be argued and is therefore acceptable. Premise 4 states a simple,


logical fact and can not be argued either. Premise 5 is easily refutable and is


not acceptable. Relevancy: Premise one is directly related to premise 2.


Premise 2 is proved true by the facts presented in premise 3. Premise 4 is


related to premise 3 through its usage of the information in 3. Premise 5 is


not relative to any of the other premises and allows this argument to not meet


the Relevancy condition. Grounds: This argument does not pass the G


condition because it does not meet the R condition. Premise 5 needs to be


supported by a sub-argument in order to be acceptable on the G condition.


Argument #2 Conductive Reasoning In today’s society people attempt to


cover up their mistakes, hoping that nobody will notice, this is not an


honorable act. Most people are not courageous or brave and rarely help when


someone is in trouble. Now days, people are quick to sue and often greedy


when it comes to money and financial matters. People are only generous


when others are watching. The more money the better! Loyalty is rarely seen


in any way shape or form. From the smallest social circle to family situations


across the nation, all lack loyalty. We live in a world of aggression and


revenge. If we are wronged we want to get that person or persons back. All


of these above principles, which happen to be in the Chivalric Code, are


often not seen in present day society. P1 In today’s society people attempt to


cover up their mistakes, hoping that no one will notice, this is not an


honorable act. P2 Most people are not courageous or brave; people no longer


help when they see that a person is in trouble. P3 Now more than ever


people are sue happy, intending to get everything that is theirs and more;


they are generous only when they have to be. P4 Loyalty is rarely seen


people cheat one another everyday, parents abandon their children, and


people talk about each other when they are not around. P5 People who are


able to “forgive and forget” are not common. Revenge, lawsuits and


aggression have taken their place. P6 Honor, courage, generosity,


forgiveness, and loyalty are rarely seen. Therefore, C Chivalry is dead. 1 + 2


+ 3 + 4 + 5 + 6 C (Converging Premises into one conclusion) Counter


Argument Honorable people treat others fairly and keep their word. People


are usually courageous and help those in trouble with out thinking of


themselves. People would rather give than receive showing that most


everyone is generous. People hardly ever ask for the return of something they


have loaned. People rarely cheat on each other or leave friends, children or


anyone else they love. These are all part of the Code of Chivalry. P1


Honorable people treat others fairly and keep their word. P2 People are


courageous and help those in trouble with out thinking of themselves. P3


People would rather give than receive showing that most everyone is


generous. P4 People hardly ever ask for the return of something that they


>loaned. P5 People rarely cheat on each other or leave friends, children, or


anyone else they love behind. Therefore, C Chivalry is alive. A.R.G.


Conditions Conductive Argument P1 A- known to be a priori true R-


positive relevance P2 A- matter of common knowledge R- positive relevance


P3 A- matter of common knowledge R- positive relevance P4 A-known to a


priori true R- positive relevance P5 A- matter of common knowledge R-


positive relevance P 1-5 G- all grounds for cogent argument Counter


Argument P1 A- Highly refutable, not acceptable R- positive relevance P2


A- premise is refutable on the basis of common knowledge R- positive


relevance P3 A- highly refutable R- positive relevance P4 A- vague or


ambiguous, not acceptable R- positive relevance P5 A- begs the question R-


positive relevance P 1-5 G- all grounds for argument Argument #3 Inductive


Reasoning P1 On an average day in North Carolina, 100 women are victims


of rape or attempted rape and many others are battered, predominantly by


men that they know. P2 The population is bigger in California than in North


Carolina. So probably, P3 On an average day in the California, over 100


women are victims of rape or attempted rape and many others are battered,


predominantly by men that they know. P4 Rape is a form of assault to a


woman, and assaulting a woman shows no respect for a woman. P5


Respecting a woman is a rule under the code of chivalry. Therefore, C


Chivalry is dead. A.R.G. Conditions First, we will test the premises of the


subargument for acceptability. P1 is acceptable based on testimony. P2 is


acceptable based on common knowledge. Next, we will test for relevance.


Both of the premises are positively relevant to the conclusion. Finally, we


test for good grounds. Both premises being acceptable and relevant,


therefore, there are good grounds for the conclusion. Now we will move on


to the whole argument. P4 is acceptable based on common knowledge. P5 is


acceptable a priori based on the code of chivalry. The subargument, P4, and


P5 are all positively relevant to the conclusion. There are also good grounds


provided for the conclusion. Therefore, this argument is cogent. Counter


Argument P1 60% of men polled at Cal Poly open doors for women. So


probably, P3 Around 60% of men in San Luis Obispo open doors for


women. P4 Opening a door for a woman is a sign of respect. P5 Showing


respect for a woman is a rule under the code of chivalry. Therefore, C


Chivalry is not dead. The previous argument also uses inductive reasoning.


We are applying the statistics we found true at Cal Poly to the population of


San Luis Obispo. We feel that this sample is representative because we


polled a total of 68 people at various locations on campus, including the


recreation center, the library, the lighthouse, the campus store, the university


union, and the business building breeze way. We also feel that this sample


can apply to the population of San Luis Obispo because Cal Poly students


account for a large amount of the population of the city. A.R.G. Conditions


Now we must take the argument through A.R.G. First, we deal with the


subargument. P1 is acceptable because of testimony. It is also positively


relevant to the conclusion and as a result of the above paragraph it also


provides good grounds for the conclusion. Now we move on to the whole


argument. P4 is acceptable based on common knowledge. P5 is acceptable a


priori based on the code of chivalry. The subargument, P4, and P5 are all


positively relevant to the conclusion. Based on the fact that all the premises


are acceptable and relevant to the conclusion, there are good grounds. This


argument is also cogent. Argument #4 Analogy “The president of the United


States is a citizen who is entitled to represent the people of the United States


and we look up to him as a role model. Recently, the president lied about his


affair with Monica Lewinsky. If our president lies, then it shows us that it is


okay to lie. Lying goes against the code of chivalry. Therefore, seeing the


president’s actions, chivalry is dead. P1 The president is a citizen who is


entitled to represent the people of the United States. P2 We, as citizens, look


up to the President as a role model. P3 The president lied about his affair


with Monica Lewinsky. (Christian Science Monitor) For our purposes, P4


Lying is knowingly not telling the absolute truth. P5 If our president lies


then it shows us that it is okay to lie. P6 Lying goes against the code of


chivalry. (Refer to the code of chivalry.) Therefore, C Chivalry is dead.


A.R.G. Conditions As far as linking goes, P1 P2 and P3 are linked and P4 is


a subargument. Then P4 P5 and P6 are linked leading to the conclusion. P1


definitely passes the A condition because it is common knowledge that the


president represents the United States. It is positively relevant to P2 because


it ties into the idea that because our president lied he is not chivalrous,


therefore chivalry being dead. It also passes the G condition because it is


linked with the other premises that support the subargument. P2 is also


acceptable because once again it is common knowledge. It is negatively


relevant to P3, but passes on the G because it offers support to the


subargument. P3 is acceptable because it is taken from a newspaper. It is


positively relevant to the subargument, P4 and passes on the G due to the


fact that it offers support to the conclusion. P4 is a subargument, and


because it’s premises pass the A condition is automatically passes the A


condition. It is positively relevant to P5 because it is talking about lying


which ties directly with the conclusion. Believing this premise true and


bringing it together with the other premises, it passes the G condition. P5 is


a little wishy washy, so we will pass it provisionally, hoping that the R and


G condition pass. It is positively relevant to P6 and it passes on the G


condition due to the fact it is talking about the connection between lying, the


president, and the code of chivalry. P6 is acceptable on the basis that it was a


premise defended elsewhere. It is positively relevant to the conclusion and


passes on the grounds when taken collectively with all the other premises.


So our argument, passing all the proper conditions, is cogent. Counter


Argument “The president of the United States is a representative of the


people. His main job is to guide this country into economic prosperity and


solve many of the current problems in the United States today. We as


citizens, have no right to pry into the personal life of the president and


should only be concerned with his governmental duties. Therefore, your


argument (previous example) is unacceptable. (Deductive Reasoning) P1


The president of the United States is a representative of the people. P2 His


main job is to guide this country into economic prosperity and solve the


current problems in the United States today. P3 We have no right to pry into


the personal life of the president. P4 We should only be concerned with the


president’s governmental duties. Therefore, C Your argument is


unacceptable. A.R.G. Conditions P1 and P2 are premises that could stand on


their own. P3 and P4 are definitely connected because they offer the most


support for my conclusion. As far as the A.R.G. conditions, P1 is acceptable


because it is common knowledge. It is positively relevant to P2, supporting


the fact that he guides our country. It also passes on the grounds because it


goes towards supporting the conclusion. P2 is acceptable because again it is


based on common knowledge. It is definitely relevant to P3. But, whether it


is positively relevant depends on your own opinion. And it passes on


grounds because it is offering support for the conclusion. P3 it pretty much


an opinion and depending on your own views would depend on whether or


not to choose it to be acceptable. It is definitely relevant to the conclusion


and it counts in favor of P4 so it is positively relevant to P4. Pushing the


acceptability aside, if we belief this to be true then it passes on the G. P4


passes on the same conditions and in the same way as P3 did. P4 is based on


opinion and it depends on your own views In Final Analysis As one can


clearly see, the examples that we provided clearly establish the resolution


that chivalry is dead. We provided clear and cogent arguments, which


demonstrate that the Chivalric Code is something of the past that died out a


long time ago. The world has outgrown the moral codes that we once lived


by. Small hints and broad generalizations of chivalry can still be applied to


everyday life, but the practice of chivalry is and has been dead for a long


time.


317

Сохранить в соц. сетях:
Обсуждение:
comments powered by Disqus

Название реферата: Chivalry Essay Research Paper Chilvalry is the

Слов:3251
Символов:20628
Размер:40.29 Кб.