РефератыИностранный языкDeDead Poets As Tragic Drama Essay Research

Dead Poets As Tragic Drama Essay Research

Dead Poets As Tragic Drama Essay, Research Paper


Dead Poets as Tragic Drama


The character Neil in Dead Poets Society is a good example of a tragic hero. He is


a character that is controlled by his passionate nature and by an insatiable desire to act in


the theatre, against the wishes of his authoritative father. Neil is portrayed as a person of


high stature and the events involving him in particular invoke pathos in the viewers.


Feelings of pity and compassion towards Neil increase as he pursues acting and conflict


arises between him and his father.


The advice I would give to Neil is: be strong and proud of your passions and


pursue them to your heart’s content, yet, thoroughly express to your father the emotions


you feel towards acting and towards him, and assure him that, although you love and


respect him, you will not be drawn from your destiny; you will act, with or without his


approval.


Neil’s tragic flaw is his passionate nature.


Following the end of Neil’s play, critical events unfold that have a great effect on


the viewers. Immediately after the play ends, Neil is quickly ushered by his father to the


car waiting outside. Neil’s father is obviously very angry and does not permit Neil to


speak with his friends and particularly John Keating. The viewers are aware of the


reasons for the actions of Neil’s father – Neil was specifically instructed to withdraw


from the play – yet sympathize with Neil’s predicament.


Neil is taken home to his waiting mother where his father sternly informs him that


he will be enrolled in military school the following morning. Upon his completion of


military school Neil will enter medical school. The orders are unreasonable and


inconsiderate of Neil’s desires. Neil, however, fails to summon the courage to explain to


his father how he truly feels towards acting and the viewer again feel pity and


compassion for Neil.


Through John Keating, Neil has realized his true passion, acting. He boldly


attempts to “seize the day” and “suck the marrow from life”, and so, his cohorts follow


his lead. When Neil meets his premature death towards the end of the film, and fulfills his


destiny as ‘tragic hero’, the school immediately con

ducts an inquiry, namely targeted at


John Keating who’s unorthodox teaching methods and advice, they feel, provoked the


actions of Neil and the other boys. The viewers are aware of the actual occurrences in and


out of John Keating’s classroom, and feel that he is not entirely responsible and that the


school’s inquiry is somewhat unwarranted. Facing expulsion and disgrace, the boys are


forced to unite against John Keating and confess to the happenings at the meetings of the


Dead Poets Society. John Keating is subsequently relieved of his teaching position and


the viewers share a sense of injustice.


In the final scene the emotions of the viewers are finally purged and a catharsis


takes place when, as he is collecting his belongings and leaving the classroom, John


Keating is bid farewell by half of the students, standing atop their desks and announcing


“Oh Captain, my Captain!”. The boys have shed the social norms imposed on them at the


school and have begun to think for themselves; they have, in a sense, evolved, not into


the defying products of John Keating but into capable independent thinkers. As John


Keating thanks his students and the film closes, there is a feeling of satisfaction and


closure, despite the tragic occurrences in the film.


The downfall of John Keating is a result of both his ‘tragic flaw’ and an accident


of fate. For the argument of his ‘tragic flaw’, John Keating is himself driven by a passion


to teach English poetry and literature but also possesses an acute stubbornness and


resentment towards conformity. The latter of the flaw is not imposed on but expressed to


the students who respond willingly to the teachings. This response, however, is perceived


by the school administraion as a threat towards the long tradition of honor held at the


school and leads to the dismissal of John Keating.


For the argument of an accident of fate, John Keating is not, however large his


influence may be, responsible for the actions of Neil, Neil’s father, or the other boys of


the Dead Poet’s Society. Decisions made were decisions made alone by the person


deciding. John Keating’s downfall is a combination of both internal and external factors,


some within his control, some not.

Сохранить в соц. сетях:
Обсуждение:
comments powered by Disqus

Название реферата: Dead Poets As Tragic Drama Essay Research

Слов:804
Символов:5190
Размер:10.14 Кб.