РефератыИностранный языкChChildhood Education And Social Inequalities Essay Research

Childhood Education And Social Inequalities Essay Research

Childhood Education And Social Inequalities Essay, Research Paper


Early Childhood Development and Social Inequalities By All families should


have the same opportunities to live a descent life. But due to the backgrounds


of some families, and children, they may not have a chance for this. There are


certain risk factors that have a bearing on social inequalities in health, and


particularly those that are prone to preventative intervention. There are many


that I could talk about, but I have picked out four of these factors to talk


about. They are biological factors, family and social factors, parenting factors,


and attachment. Even these I feel that I will not be able to cover completely,


because there is only a certain part we see, and then there is the that is kept


hidden from all. There are many factors that influence the development and


social inequalities in a child?s life. These include biological, family and social


factors, parenting factors, attachment, and the way non-maternal care is


influenced. All of these are risk factors that are likely to have a bearing on the


child?s social inequalities on their health. The biological factors include


premature birth, low birth weight, and a serious medical illness. The


significantly influence and infants growth. ?Low birth weight, less than 2500


grams, has a prevalence of 6 percent in white middle-class U.S. women, and


15 percent in ethnic minority teenagers. These teenagers tend to be single


mothers.? At the Infant Health and Development Project, they found that in a


large amount of premature infants, that their IQ was less than 85 at three


years of age. Race was the greatest factor in predicting outcome, that was


followed by maternal education, and then medical complications. The infants


of poorly educated African American mothers (90%) who had medical


complications were severely compromised, while only nine percent of white


infants with well-educated parents fell into this category, regardless of birth


complications. There are other biological variables that seem to be


independent of psycho-social factors. In one study, it was shown that if the


mother smoked during her pregnancy, there appeared to be a high risk for


conduct disorder and male children. This study suggested that are maybe a


direct effect on the still developing fetus. ?The influences of genetics are seen


as an impact on social inequalities. The MacArthur Longitudinal Twin Study


provided researchers with important information related to genetic factors in


behavioral inhibition.? Behavioral inhibition is unstable between ages of 14 to


24 months, and that this change is due to genetics rather then environmental


factors. It suggests that genes may turn off and on at different ages, and that


genes are ?context dependent.? In example of the Twin Study, comparisons


between the identical and fraternal twins show that there was a continual


genetic influence showing responses on cognitive, emotional, and behavior


arousal in response to distress of another, at the ages of 24 and 36 months.


Social influences that were shared by the twins with their interactions with


parents and others were a major influence with the mothers, but not the


testers. So genetic influences showed up more readily. Genetic influences


were ever present are not environmentally controlled. Maybe the social


background of a child with a low SES (socioeconomic status) could inhibit or


caused the trigger effect (turn on or off) of genetic propensities. Our next


topic is the family and social factors. Two of the biggest are social class and


poverty. These have been found very often to predict the developmental


outcomes of childhood. There are suggestions that infants and young children


who grow up in poverty are more likely to suffer health problems., cognitive


delays and behavioral problems as compared to children who do not grow


up in poverty. These poor children ?more likely to experience medical


problems such as lead poisoning, failure to thrive, otitis media, iron


deficiency, anemia, and to score lower on developmental and cognitive


scales.? There are many variables that effect relationships indirectly, these


include nutrition, housing, medical care, lifestyles, neighborhood quality,


accidents, and exposure to toxic substances. Also a social and emotional


qualities in which the child develops: parenting skills, maltreatment, maternal


disharmony, and quality of care. Young children who have a low SES are


assigned the term ?doubled jeopardy,? because they are not only exposed to


risk factors more frequently, but they also experience more serious


consequences from these risks. People from a low SES background are


vulnerable to negative events in their lives such as single parenting, social


isolation, and unemployment. The fate of the child raised in poverty is further


jeopardized by more exposure to power-assertive discipline and physical


punishment without the parenting support they need. Evidence of poor


abusive families who live in poverty is likely to be associated with an increase


in the severity of maltreatment. ?The effect of low SES on social development


and delinquency is particularly strong when experienced in early childhood.?


Poverty severely affects the child?s home environment. There are other


features of poverty that are also linked to social class. There is a study done


in 1991 that showed adolescent mothers who had a two-month old infant,


that there was more role-reversal in low SES subjects. Infants and toddlers


who live in poor families showed that their level of stimulation is likely to be


lower than in more affluent households. This lower-level of stimulation, in the


support which is found in the homes of low SES children is frequently pointed


out as the most important detriment of a poor developmental outcome. There


many specific family risk factors that are important to social inequality, the


three that stand out the most are maternal quality, adolescent parenting, and


family violence. There are many studies that link maternal quality to infant


functioning. ?Conflict predicts abnormal infant behavior and conduct


problems in toddlers.? In some studies the comparison of the effect of family


instability such as losing a parent through divorce or death. Maternal conflict


has always had an impact on children?s behavioral problems, and has caused


a greater negative influence. The risk to children is associated to overt


expressions of inter-parental anger, expression of physical hostility,


child-rearing disagreements, and the lack of resolving conflicts. In families


were there is only a mother, their children have injury rates that are twice that


of two parent families. These injuries are statistically explained by the


development of social inequalities such as poverty, poor housing, and social


isolation. When the parent is an adolescent is well-established that there is a


greater risk factor in the development of infants. Parenting behavior of these


adolescent mothers is deficient in many important areas. They are more


passive in one-on-one interactions, stimulate the infant less, smile and talk


less, fewer positive physical or eye contacts, given more commands and


authorative statements, more restrictive, physically intrusive and punitive, they


make fewer elaborative and descriptive responses, and are less committed


and satisfied with being a mother. The parent

s who show this usually have


children who speak less, have poorer cognitive and linguistic outcomes, are


impulsive, aggressive, have social withdrawal, insecure attachments, and poor


peer relationships. Maltreatment of children is another big risk-factor with


significant bearing on the social class. Maltreatment is associated with


aggression, and ?four times as many(about 20%) of maltreated children go on


to become delinquent.? The causes can be associated with biological


psychological, and social bearings. There is no doubt that early maltreatment


of children can affect their neurodevelopment as well as their behavior. If the


parents have access to community resources, and the support those


resources provide are increased, then the possibility of maltreatment is


diminished. Disorganized attachment may be linked to maltreatment. Mothers


with toddlers who reported an abundance of partner violence were more


likely to show disorganized attachment relationships, even if there was no


evidence of the children themselves having been maltreated. ?Maltreated


youngsters show many other social and emotional problems including


indiscriminate sociability, poor affect regulation, heightened levels of


aggression, social withdrawal, inconsistent and unpredictable signals. Perhaps


most critically, there appear to be major dysfunctions of self development.? It


is suggested that if a child is maltreated early, then that may undermine the


relationship between the infant and the care-giver. This limits the way they


interact with their care-givers and other children. It focuses them to use action


instead of words to influence the behavior of others, and the way themselves


act. One of the most influential impacts on child development is child-rearing,


or parenting. When we look at parenting this way social inequalities are most


relevant. The mothers who are from low SES groups are apt to provide less


learning and academic stimulation, they offer less variety in social and cultural


experiences, less warmth and affection, and more punitive care- giving such


as yelling, scolding, hitting and spanking. These behaviors have shown to be


associated with poor results including a lower IQ, and emotional and


behavioral problems. ?A recent report from the multi-site Infant Health and


Development Program showed that harsh parental discipline in the context of


low maternal warmth, was associated with IQ scores for girls at three years


of age 12 points lower than the IQ scores of girls who received low


punishment and high warmth.? Young mothers who have great stress in their


mother-child relationship have found it more difficult to make use of job


opportunity and basic skills programs. In regards of their strength in the


relationship between quality of parenting, and socioeconomic status is


moderate. When parenting is based on the assertion of power instead of


supportive guidance, it breeds the development of behavioral disorders. In a


study conducted by NICHD Early Child Care Research Network, the ratings


of mothers? sensitivity – positive regard, non-intrusiveness, sensitivity to


non-distress expression, based on videotaped observations of mother-child


interaction at 6-15months showed non-complaint behavior in the laboratory,


as well as in the home at two and three years. When parents make ?do


demands? such as ?come and eat,? ?sit down,? and ?get dressed? to two and


three year olds, instead of ?don?t demands? ?don?t get lost,? ?don?t stay up


too late,? as well as using positive affects, the children?s level of compliance is


enhanced. Another psychiatric problem that can be connected with social


inequalities in early childhood development is substance abuse. Evidence


shows that there is no simple relationship between prenatal drug exposure


and specific developmental outcomes. But the combination of biological and


psycho-social risk factors that are related with drug abuse. It has been shown


that there are serious effects on development. A drug using life style could be


tied to inadequate nutrition and poor prenatal care, which compromises fetal


growth. ?Drug exposure is likely to affect CNS development as a function of


timing, dose, and duration.? These factors are impossible to control, and their


impact can be moderated by other factors that are not related to the nature of


the exposure. By assessing this information, I think that maybe we should


look at the existing health visitation program offered by the state. If we make


some changes I feel that the health visitation may be more effective. We could


have them working more with mothers before the birth of their child, giving


them information on what to expect. Also have them work in a structured


program of proven proficiency, one that has shown good results. Priority


should also be given to mothers who, in the past have had a history of


childhood maltreatment, give special training in child management techniques,


all of these should lead up to good childhood care. There could also be


experimental trials conducted for early parent-training, who are at high risk.


These could include focusing on child behavior management, having the


parent take classes on how to manage different behaviors. Enlist the aide of


the community in parent- training, this could be offered in groups instead of


individuals, this does away with the singling out of people who are more at


risk than others. There should also be a much wider voluntary program for


mothers at risk, and this could be started in the child?s first six months. A


specialized trainer could conduct this program, maybe a mother who has


already gone through the program. In the pre-school curriculum problems of


behavior may be addressed. Schools could have specially trained pre-school


teachers aimed at reducing the risk of behavior disorders, and conduct


problems. For children and parents who are going through the loss of a


parent, by divorce or death, a program could be set up. This program would


help the parents to manage the conflict of divorce, in order to reduce the child


from feeling like they are the problem. It would also help the child to stay in


touch with both parents after the divorce. This program could be integrated


into the school system, with school based counseling services for these


children.


Bibliography


?Bibliography Easterbrooks, M. A., & Emde, R. N. ?Marriage and Infant:


Different Systems’ Linkages for Mothers and Infants.? (1986) Paper


presented at the International Conference on Infant Studies, Beverly Hills,


CA. Elder, G. H., & Rockwell, R. C.. Research in Community and Mental


Health 1(1979) Korner, A. F., Stevenson, D. K., Kraemer, H. C., Spiker,


D., & et al. Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics 14 (1993)


Lewis, D. O., Mallouh, C., & Webb, V Child Maltreatment: Theory and


Research on the Causes and Consequences of Child Abuse and Neglect .


(1989) Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press. Parker, S., Greer, S.,


& Zuckerman, B. Double Jeopardy: The Impact of Poverty on Early Child


Development. Pediatric Clinics of North America (1988) Robinson, J. L.,


Kagan, J., Reznick, J. S., & Corley, R..Developmental Psychology (1992)


Schneider-Rosen, K., & Cicchetti, D. Developmental Psychology 27 (1991)


Smith, J. R., & Brooks-Gunn, J. Archives of Pediatric and Adolescent


Medicine, 151 (1997)

Сохранить в соц. сетях:
Обсуждение:
comments powered by Disqus

Название реферата: Childhood Education And Social Inequalities Essay Research

Слов:2488
Символов:17501
Размер:34.18 Кб.