РефератыИностранный языкAnAnalysis Of Two Poems By Emily

Analysis Of Two Poems By Emily

Dickinson : 1737 And 486 Essay, Research Paper


`Emily Dickinson?s poems are both fairly short


lyrical compositions conveying and even sharing the deep thoughts, feelings and


state of mind of a single speaker in a clear, informal language.? ?Rearrange a ?Wife?s? affection!? proclaims


the first verse of the poem entitled 1737, although no question mark is


present, the following line appears to answer in retaliation to the brisk


statement, ?When they dislocate my Brain!??


Tightly bound into five stanzas of equal size with the lines of the


quatrains also of a similar length, the shape of the composition contributes to


the fast delivery of her indignant repudiation for the state of


?Wifehood.?? This effect is conveyed through the repetition of


exclamation marks and the strongly suggestive rhyme and assonantal ?slant? on


the end word of each line in the first stanza, ?affection!, Brain!,


Bosom! and man!??


Dickinson?s use of five-foot iambic pentameter in this poem, is of a


similar pattern to ?everyday speech? and contributes to the upbeat pace of


reading and the readers belief that the feelings expressed are real and


true.? Moreover, her use of alliteration


heightens the tale of a painful and melodramatic passion, ?troth, taught?love,


leaped?burden ? borne,? her ?big, bandaged


secret,? a metaphor of pain, from which the only relief is ?through the grave.?


Whilst the form of poem 486 shares similarities with


1737, four stanzas divided into quatrains, the second stanza employs five


lines.? This technique helps to convey a


sense of serious thought and contemplation, ?Let me think ? I?m sure?.That this


was all ?.? These regular, but brief expressions are f

ollowed by dashes, which


highlight key phrases, such as ?live-aloud-? a stylistic devise that loosens the


stiff formality of punctuation and effects a breathlessness throughout the


verse.? Written in the first person,


?I?, the poet and speaker in poem 486 become one and the same.? Indeed, the poet dwells on her size


throughout the poem, ? I was the slightest?noteless?little.? Yet her continual


profession of smallness, does not reflect her stature, so much as her conscious


desire to be ?small? and ?slight? to play along with societies view of her


insignificance, and turning it to her own advantage.??? The poem recaptures the conditions and circumstances


of herself, as a poet, and in the second stanza she describes the advantages of


her situation. ?Inconspicuous? was what was needed ?to catch the mint/That


never ceased to fall,? she shunned ?The Racket? biding her time with ?my little


lamp, and book-? which are symbolic of her poetic tools.? Dickinson?s poem discloses the guarded and


secretive life of a persona embarrassed by the noise of a shared community,


depicting her living most enjoyably and creatively ?at night.?? In reality she did renounce the social world


for the confines of a poetic vocation in her ?small room,? reflecting her true


retreat from society.? Death is a


recurring theme in the poetry of Emily Dickinson and it is in this vein that


both of the poems end.? The ?Weary


Keeper? of ?my secret? takes it to her grave in 1737, whilst in 486, she ?could


die,? as the poem tells us she has lived, ?noteless? and without


significance.? Ironically Emily


Dickinson only received public recognition and acclaim for her poetry, in the


main, following her death. ???????????

Сохранить в соц. сетях:
Обсуждение:
comments powered by Disqus

Название реферата: Analysis Of Two Poems By Emily

Слов:599
Символов:4055
Размер:7.92 Кб.