РефератыИностранный языкSoSolidarity The Movement And It

Solidarity The Movement And It

Solidarity: The Movement And It’s Causes Essay, Research Paper


name = Lukasz Cholodecki


email = lcholode@athena.valpo.edu


publish = yes


subject = Modern European History 315


title = Solidarity: The Movement and It’s Causes


papers =


Solidarity:


The Movement and It’s


Causes


History 315/515


Prof. Startt


Essay #2


The Solidarity movement in Poland was one of the most


dramatic developments in Eastern Europe during the Cold War. It


was not a movement that began in 1980, but rather a continuation


of a working class and Polish intelligentsia movement that began


in 1956, and continued in two other risings, in 1970 and 1976.


The most significant of these risings began in the shipyards of


the ‘Triple City’, Gdansk, Sopot and Gdynia in 1970. The first


and by far the most violent and bloody of the workers revolts


came in June of 1956, when at least 75 people died in the


industrial city of Poznan. The third uprising took place in


1976 with workers striking in Warsaw, and rioting in the city of


Radom.


What made the Solidarity movement peaceful and far more


successful in comparison to that of the previous three? The


Solidarity movement originated in the working class, but unlike


the previous three risings it also worked with and was involved


with the Polish intellectual community. Was this the reason


behind its success? Or was it instead the result of the U.S.S.R.


losing it’s hold in the Eastern bloc, and the fledgling economy


of Poland that made such a movement inevitable? While everyone


of these points was a factor, the strongest and most compelling


argument can be made for the unification and working together of


Poland’s most influential social classes, the Polish


intelligentsia, the workers, and the Church. This strategy


eventually led to the infamous ’roundtable’ talks, and the


collapse of communism itself in Poland.


The Beginnings of a Movement


The ‘Polish October’ of 1956 did not begin with Stalin’s


death in 1953, in fact Poland was quite calm, in stark contrast


with other Eastern bloc countries. While demonstrations took


place in Plzen, Czechoslovakia, and a revolt was taking place in


East Germany in mid-June, Poland was slow to follow the ‘New


Course’ that was being offered by neighboring countries. This


was a result of a much slower relaxation than the other countries


experienced. Regardless, social and intellectual unrest began


building up, with collectivization being slackened and censorship


showing cracks, the nation had a sense that a new start must be


made.


The Polish intelligentsia was one of the most important


groups to emerge during this period. The Polish intelligentsia


is, and remains, a distinct social class that is composed of


those with a higher education, or those who at least share


similar tastes. The Polish intelligentsia originates in the


nineteenth-century, when Polish nobility moved to the cities to


occupy itself with literature, art, and revolutionary politics,


due to it’s loss of estates and land. This distinct social


group was feared and recognized by both Stalin and Hitler, 50


percent of Polish lawyers and doctors and 40 percent of Polish


university professors where murdered in World War II. The


reemergence of this group leading to the ‘Polish October’ is


significant in that it would play a crucial role 25 years later.


Unfortunately for Poland, the Polish intelligentsia and the


working class often led separate uprisings, and had trouble


connecting in the causes that they were fighting for.


Many events and reasons, many similar to that of 1980


culminated to the uprisings in October, and the crackdown that


followed. The focus has to be put primarily on the fact that it


was only in part a workers rebellion, because the workers’


movement in Poznan had no central structure or leadership. It


was instead a rebellion of the intelligentsia, which was in a


system that denied them access to the elite. The intelligentsia


did not put both movements together, the different social classes


were divided in what they wanted. It is incredulous that the


intelligentsia did not look to make a concerted effort with the


workers, as it would not do in 1970 or 1976.


The New Power


The following events were the prelude to 1980, and they are


tragic. On the twelfth of December 1970, a series of unexpected


price changes were announced. Consumer goods only rose a small


percentage in price, but certain foods had huge price increases.


Flour rose by sixteen percent, sugar rose by fourteen percent,


and meat cost seventeen percent more. On the next morning


three thousand workers from the Lenin shipyard at Gdansk marched


on the provincial party headquarters. The workers were ordered


back to work, the maddened workers incited a riot. With fires


started and stones thrown, the city militia could not hold the


masses back. On Tuesday, December fifteenth, the workers at the


Paris Commune Shipyard in Gdynia stopped work and demonstrated in


the main streets. A general strike was announced in Gdansk, and


the police opened fire on demonstrators. Men on both sides were


killed. In the fighting the Party building and the railway


station was burned down. The next day the rebellion spread to


the towns of Slupsk and Eblag, and the workers at the Warski


Shipyards in Szczecin were preparing to strike. Reports were


coming in of supportive strikes in other cities.


On Wednesday workers began occupation strikes in factories.


On Thursday morning, workers walking to the Paris Commune yard


were fired on, at least thirteen were killed. Later that day


workers from the Szczecin shipyard surged out into the city, and


street fighting, costing at least sixteen lives, continued


through Friday. By Saturday it appeared a nation-wide strike


would inssue. Twenty-one demands were drawn up by the workers,


one of which asked for ‘independent trade unions under the


authority of the working class’. Although this was not


achieved in 1970, it is apparent that this was clearly a marking


of a new era in the thought process of the Polish workers. The


course of action that Prime Minister Gomulka took cost him his


job, he was the one who ordered the use of fire arms against


workers. Brezhnev himself advised a political rather than a


military solution. Gomulka’s fate was sealed, and the reign of


Gierek ensued.


The movement was far from over, but the most important parts


had already happened. The lack of the Polish intelligentsia was


apparent in a face to face meeting with Gierek, and other party


officials, that the workers at the shipyards in Sczecin and


Gdansk had on the twenty-fourth of January, 1971. Gierek coerced


the workers to stop the strike by appealing himself as a Polish


patriot, and a man that wanted to keep Poland from collapse.


These workers’ neither had the thought nor the conceptualizatio

n


that a collapse could very well be what Poland needed. The


intellectuals could have done exactly what was done in 1980, the


opportunity was just as ripe, but it passed, and another


opportunity would not arise for another five years.


The government could do nothing but appeal to the workers to


help them out, otherwise more demands would have to have been met


by them. In mid-February, with uneasiness in the country, Gierek


restored the old prices. This was the first time a decision by a


communist government was overturned by the working class, the


class that theoretically was in power.


Although a larger victory could have been had, the workers


had no concept of overthrowing socialism, they merely wanted a


better socialism. In 1976 another price increase went into


affect, this time raising meat prices by sixty-nine percent, and


sugar prices by one hundred percent. With memories of the


successful 1970 campaign, on June twenty-fifth work stopped all


over the country. Almost immediately Gierek repealed the


increases. It was clear the working class had a lot of power,


power that it had not yet maximized. Power that the


intelligentsia was only beginning to see as a source for future


social change.


Solidarity


So far most of the work in revolutionizing Poland was done


by the workers. So where was the Polish intelligentsia that


seemed to disappear from the landscape after the 1950’s? It was


always there, but while it was respected by the workers, the


Polish intelligentsia had not worked very hard to unite itself


with them. A social split existed that made the intelligentsia


feel somewhat superior to the workers, feeling a change could


only be made by intellectuals at the top.


That view and feeling slowly changed, the biggest of these


changes in social thought appeared when the printings of illegal,


uncensored leaflets and books by a group of intellectuals calling


themselves the Committee for the Defense of Workers’ Rights (KOR)


and the Movement for the Defense of Civil and Citizens’ Rights


(ROPCiO) emerged. In September of 1979, a press briefing by the


Ministry of the Interior listed twenty-six ‘anti-socialist’


groups. These groups were not publicly denounced, but they were


open to beatings and imprisonment by the secret police. One of


the major events to occur in 1977 was an informal alliance


between the Catholic Church and the opposition. The Church


would be instrumental in uniting the cause of workers in the


Baltic to those in other regions of the country.


On the other side of the coin, Poland’s economy was


disastrous. In fact the national income fell by two percent in


1979. Industrial output was showing negative growth of five


percent. From having one of the highest growth rates in the


world, only five years later Poland had an economy in such


shambles that it was dependent on Western banks to keep


functioning. The time was perfect to strike.


On the fourteenth of August 1980 the members of a little


group called the Free Trade Union conspired to start a strike at


the Lenin Shipyard in Gdansk, which employed 17,000 workers. The


pretext was so a crane driver named Anna Walentynowicz, would get


her job back after being fired. The reason behind this was that


she was one of the most powerful orator’s in the whole strike


movement. They had tried to start a strike a month before under


the pretext of a meat price increase, but they had failed. This


time they brought posters and leaflets, which they promptly put


up. They declared ‘We Demand the Reinstatement of Anna


Walentynowicz and a Cost of Living Rise of 1,000 Zlotys’.


Men quickly gathered around to read the signs and leaflets,


ignoring the party officials calls to go back to work. A mass


meeting formed at one of the gates. Klemens Gniech, the manager,


argued and pleaded the workers not to form a strike committee.


The meeting was starting to loose steam as some workers began to


go back to their jobs. At that moment, a man embittered by the


deaths of the strikes of 1970, maddened by being imprisoned over


one hundred times, stepped out. This was a man who was still


furious over being fired four years earlier from that very


shipyard, a man who had a keen understanding of the workers


struggles, he jumped up to the bulldozer roof and yelled at


Gniech “Remember me? I gave ten years to this shipyard. But you


sacked me four years ago!” His name was Lech Walesa. He


turned to the men and women below him and shouted that an


occupation strike would begin now. He was cheered loudly, and


soon they were asking for him to be reinstated also.


No one realized what this would set off. By the next day


strikes began to spread throughout the ‘Triple-City’. The


demands were far bigger now, even asking for the right to


establish free trade unions. The leaders began to negotiate with


Gniech, but what they had not realized was that the whole city


basically gone on strike. The strike committee agreed on a 1,500


zloty pay raise, and was ready to return to work. Walesa went


outside and announced the news, to his surprise he was jeered.


He had misread the mood. Instantaneously he changed his mind and


went around the shipyard pleading everyone to continue


striking. The strike continued and it spread. One of the


biggest developments in the history of Polish strikes and


uprisings happened soon after. Intellectuals came in to help out


the workers in drafting documents and demands. They began what


eventually led to the legalization of trade unions. They played


for the high stakes, they issued ultimatums that said that they


would not negotiate until all political prisoners were freed.


These were demands that previously would not have been made.


With both groups working together, both benefited. The


government, having no choice, complied. The rest, as they say,


is history.


The Solidarity Union would soon have ten million members,


one-third of the Polish workforce. The changes that ensued


promised the downfall of socialism in Poland. Although martial


law slowed down the process in 1981, Solidarity was working in


the underground. Solidarity forced the roundtable talks that led


to free elections in 1989, and the eventual fall of communism,


not only in Poland, but in all the Soviet bloc countries.


The work of the Polish worker, and that of the Polish


intellectual accomplished what many thought would never happen.


Poland is a country with a history of uprisings, all of which


failed, except for this one. No other movement connected the


Polish intelligentsia and the Polish worker. Would Polish


insurrections have worked earlier in history if this was also the


case? One can always second guess, but it is clear the changes


that occurred in Poland, occurred because of the intellectuals


working with the workers. They had the vision, the workers had


the mass to demand that vision to become a reality.


Endnotes:

Сохранить в соц. сетях:
Обсуждение:
comments powered by Disqus

Название реферата: Solidarity The Movement And It

Слов:2518
Символов:16915
Размер:33.04 Кб.