РефератыИностранный языкBlBleeding Ireland And Black America Essay Research

Bleeding Ireland And Black America Essay Research

Bleeding Ireland And Black America Essay, Research Paper


Bleeding Ireland and Black America


Fall Road is deserted. Only a few dirt-caked, barefoot, Irishmen can be


seen shivering in the adjacent park. We walk past the Catholic neighborhoods


knowing, at any moment, buildings might explode and automatic weapon fire could


lacerate the air on every side of us. Belfast is charming, apart from the harsh


reality of guerrilla warfare and terrorism being common occurrences. For the


first time, throughout my three month tour of seventeen different European


countries, I feel truly threatened. The tension carries itself into a nearby pub


where an old man asks ?Are you jus daft? Or do ya have relatives here?? His


words hinted at my grandfather’s blunt, yet kindly, expression concerning his


birthplace in N. Ireland, ?If you haven’t been there yet, don’t go there.?


I can remember the lyrics of a Naughty by Nature song blaring over my


car radio, ?If you have never been to the ghetto, don’t ever come to the ghetto,?


as I put in a tape. My thought stream continues as it takes me to another place


where guerrilla warfare and terrorism are a part of daily life.


The gunshots and unruly pitbull barking registers over the calm of the


wet playground. Trash strings the streets and every dwelling has an eight foot,


black, metal fence circuitously about it. Two white faces gape over the hood of


a parked Cadillac. Besides the police parked down the block, they are probably


the only Caucasians in a five mile square radius. Two companies of drug dealers


fire at will scrambling for control of a superior capital making outpost. Even


at nine o’clock in the morning the combat tract roars on.


I was one of those faces peering over the car hood with horror and


revolution in my eyes. N. Richmond is a product of the same type of oppression


and violence that hacks deep into the people of N. Ireland. In the logical


evolution of an oppressed people a civil rights movement was essential. ?It was


necessary to bravely confront our most explosive issues as a people:


Racial[religious, gender, class...] hierarchy and the maldistribution of wealth


and power.? 1If only for a brief moment we achieved this, at least it happened.


We must study the past in order to get to the future. If you don’t know where


you came from, how can you possibly figure out where you are going and that is


why many people stay rooted in the same place.


For centuries, England has kept Ireland under its colonial thumb,


starving its people and manipulating them as slave labor. England stole much of


Ireland’s homeland and gave it to the Protestants allies from Scotland. Earlier


this century, England divided Ireland into two, claiming the six northernmost


counties as its own. The large number of Protestants, who remain loyal to the


Crown of England, have created a system of oppression similar to the Jim Crow


laws of the US. Oppression and second-class citizenship have limited the


Catholics of N. Irelands opportunities and taken many lives. A Civil Rights


movement was the only logical step. But first, we must discuss what lead up to


this logical step-the history.


In January 1919, the Anglo-Irish War began with the first shots being


fired at Solobeghead. Over the next year, the Royal Irish Constabulary (RIC-


British Loyalists) became the target of a Sinn Fein (The beginning roots of the


IRA) terror campaign By mid-1919, the IRB (Irish Republican Brotherhood-Part of


Sinn Fein) had infiltrated the leadership of the Volunteers (Irish Militia) and


were directing its pace on the violence. In an effort to assert control of the


group, Volunteers declared the Army of the Irish Republic.


Britain responded with violence. Special forces were sent over to impose


curfews and martial law on the Irish. These forces became known as the Black and


Tans after a popular Limerick hunt group, and because of their dark green and


khaki uniforms. Another force of veterans from the Great War, called the


Auxiliaries, joined them. Thus began a pattern of assassination and reprisal.


The IRA employed guerrilla tactics, using duck and cover strategies to attack


British troops. Their knowledge of the countryside made up for their lack of


arms. On 21 November 1920 IRA squad assassinated 14 British officers,


effectively destroying the British Secret Service in Ireland. In reprisal, the


Black and Tans fired on a crowd watching a football match at Croke Park. Twelve


people were killed, including one of the team players. The day became known as


Bloody Sunday.


After several months of mass bloodshed, a compromise was met and a ‘


Treaty of Allegiance to England’ was signed by Ireland. This split the IRA into


pro-Treaty or anti-Treaty forces. Treaty loyal troops became the Free State Army,


while the anti-Treaty forces became known as the Irregulars. On 6 July 1922,


Opponents of the Treaty rallied to the cause. Fighting brakes out in Dublin-the


ten-month civil war had begun. The first phase was bloody and brief. The Civil


war ends with many of the irregulars still controlling the South. Logically,


when the country was split the south was free and the six northern most


counties were taken by England and the Northern Protestants.


The Catholic minority of the north suffered greatly during the next


twenty years of oppression. The IRA was still at work, only it moved more


cautiously due to its growing Communist/Marxist nature and some ideological


dissension between its members.2 Data exhibits, just as the inner cities of the


US, that the rates of poverty, unemployment, serious crime, single-female headed


families and welfare dependency in N. Irelands Catholic slums, rose drastically


during this time. There was an increase in drugs, alcoholism (in Ireland?!),


guns, bombings (from both sides)3 which all created a virtual hell as ravaging


as any N. Richmond/E. Oakland-Hunterspoint/if not worse in its own way.


Structural discrimination in employment has remained a feature of


British government rule in the Six Counties. Discrimination has, in fact, been


synonymous with British rule. Unionist loyalty (Northern Protestant)-the rockbed


of the British presence – is in part, conditional on the maintenance of the


economic privilege, often marginal, which employment discrimination has


conferred on unionists.4 In one aspect, unemployment, the situation of Catholics


has actually deteriorated. Unemployment in the Six Counties in April 1989


officially stood at 107,623, representing 15.6% of the workforce. Almost half of


that figure is Catholic while they only represent less than 20% of the


population.5


Discontent with the apartheid system began to emerge in the late `60s


and led to the formation of the Northern Ireland Civil Rights Association (The


CRA which was secretly back by the IRA). Its moderate demands were aimed at


trying to reform and democratize the state. The issue of partition was not part


of its agenda. Unionists, however, interpreted any form of political dissent,


however moderate, as a threat to their privileged position and the union with


Britain.6


Peaceful civil rights supporters were, due to Protestant paranoia,


viciously attacked by the RUC and B-Specials (Both ‘English Suppresser Groups ‘


which came out of RIC and the Black and Tans). The violent reaction of the


state shocked the world as television cameras relayed scenes of unprovoked


attacks on civil rights marches and demonstrations. The British government was


not prepared to allow its financial interests to be compromised by widespread


political unrest. At 5 p.m. on August 14th, 1969, substantial numbers of British


soldiers moved into Belfast and Derry. The British army was injected into the


situation under the pagoda cover of being a peace-keeping force deployed ?to


keep the warring factions apart?. The ‘religious war’ myth was regenerated as


justification for the occupation.


In reality, it had been introduced as a life-support unit to sustain a


state which was under threat of collapse. The bad dream of partition was about


to be come the ‘nationalist nightmare’. Within a relatively short period, the


British army’s real job became apparent. With the unionist government acting


like they still were in control, the actual power behind the throne was the


British government’s agent, the British army.


Some two decades ago, people in the Six Counties were marching for civil


rights, Justice, equality and self-respect. The moderate and just demands of the


Civil Rights movement were: One man, one vote (sic); An end to the gerrymandered


local government boundaries; An end to discrimination in the allocation of


housing; An end to discrimination in employment; and The repeal of the Special


Powers Act (SPA).


Pursuit of those demands and the North Protestant regime’s reaction to


it brought the state to a point of collapse. In one year the civil rights


movement had done more to end injustice than fifty years of anti-partion


policies had begun to do.7 But, it wasn’t enough and people began to riots;


tearing apart the major cities of N. Ireland. Only the life-support system was


provided by the British army warded off the collapse, and in the process of


attempting to sustain the state they have exacerbated the situation. The


protests got rid of the SPA but three equally, if not more, repressive laws


have replaced it. Since its birth, the Six-county state has been continuously


governed by totalitarian apartheid legislation which continually causes


descent among the factions.


The provisions and effect of these and other pieces of repressive


legislation has meant that: Anyone can be stopped by British forces anywhere, at


any time. They must give their name, address, where they are coming from, where


they are going to. Anyone can be arrested anywhere, at any time. A detainee can


be held for up to seven days for interrogation. More than 60,000 arrests have


thus taken place. No further legal action was taken against the overwhelming


majority of those arrested. Powers of arrest, therefore, are used largely for


purposes of gathering information and intimidation. Some 7,000 people have been


charged with politically motivated offenses. A substantial percentage were


charged solely on the basis of statements of admission extracted through torture


and maltreatment. More than 2,000 people were interned without charge or trial


between 1971 and 1975. Extensive powers to search have led to the searching of


hundreds of thousands of premises.8 Residences, schools, industrial premises,


sports grounds and farmland have been seized for use as military installations


due to the British government over extending its powers.


Rubber and plastic bullets have been used as a means of intimidating


and deterring demonstrations. Since 1973, more than 50 thousand of these lethal


projectiles have been fired at the civilian population. Seventeen people, eight


of them young children, have been killed, most in circumstances which amount to


murder. Hundreds have been seriously injured. Injuries include serious mental


and physical disablement. Over 300, mainly unarmed, nationalists have been


killed by members of the various security agencies, the British army and the RUC.


British forces have been given virtual immunity from conviction. In 20 years,


only one British soldier has been convicted for murder while on duty. Despite


receiving a life sentence, the soldier was released after serving only two years


and three months, and was immediately reinstated in the army.9


As well as the unjust trauma and suffering on the streets, nationalist


opponents of British rule in Ireland were selected for very special treatment


inside British prisons. The struggle for decent conditions, dignity and


recognition as political prisoners has been constant throughout the past 20


years and continues today. Of all the prison campaigns, the most publicized,


because of the numbers involved and because of the toll of lives extracted, was


the `blanket protest’ which consummated during the hunger-strikes of 1980 and


1981. Deprived of political status in 1975, republican prisoners refused to wear


prison uniforms and clad themselves in blankets. Within a short period, the


punitive actions of the regime forced them to live in their cells surrounded by


their own excrement. Beatings and degradation were used, in an attempt to break


the prisoners’ will. For four years, the prisoners persevered in the most awful


conditions.


On October 27th 1980, a hunger-strike began which was to last 53 Days.


It extracted sufficient concessions from the British government to make a


settlement possible. Having secured the end of the hunger-strike, the British


said they would give in-they lied. A second hunger-strike was initiated on March


1st 1981. It lasted 217 days, ending on October 3rd where the prisoners were


given ‘international political status’ and entitled to more rights, which


Britain ignores to this day.


Civil Rights in Ireland did not accomplish its goals. Since the British


government undemocratically and violently created the State of Northern Ireland


in 1920, Catholics have been discriminated against in almost every way,


particularly in employment. All their many protests failed because the


effectiveness of protests depended on the good faith of the British government.


That good faith was not there then, it is still not there today. The marching


and fasting didn’t work and as of last year- it is back to IRA bombs in London.


As W.E.B DuBois put it:


?The Irish resist, as they have for hundreds of years, various and exasperating


forms of British [colonial] oppression. Their resistance is called crime and


under ordinary conditions would be crime; in retaliation not only the ‘guilty’


but the innocent among them are murdered and robbed and public property is


burned by English ‘guardians of the Peace’!?10


No one else should be able to understand the history of Ireland better


than a black man in the US. It works like this: You kick a man in the head and


you have him arrested for assault. You kill a man and hang the corpse for


murder. From 1776-1964, 188 years, blacks endured theses conditions all over the


United States. It still happens today when the ‘guardians of peace’, the police,


abuse their powers and racially biased legislation is passed. Since Irish and


African Americans have so much in common, why haven’t they been the best of


friends? Commonality often leads to conflict. No people in the world have in the


past gone with blither spirits to ?kill niggers? from Kingston to Delhi and from


Kumassi to Fiji.11


Noel Ignatiev’s ?How the Irish Became White? explains the history of how


the Irish immigrant rose from racially oppressed to racial oppressor. The


oppressed themselves, have continually been used to further domination over


others that are oppressed, in the interest o

f the universal oppressor. This is


the only book I know of, to focus not on how the Irish were assimilated but how


they assimilated as “whites.” Utilizing newspaper chronicles, memoirs,


biographies, and official accounts, Ignatiev traces the history of Irish and


African-American relations, revealing how the Irish in America used unions, the


Catholic Church and the Democratic party to help gain and secure their newly


found place in the ‘White Republic’ and continued to oppress blacks. On their


arrival in America, the Irish were thrown together with black people on jobs and


in neighborhoods, with predictable results. The Census of 1850 was the first to


include a class called “mulattoes”; it enumerated 406,000 nationwide.12


The interaction between Irish and Afro-Americans was not limited to


sexual affairs: in New Orleans Irish moved into the black district, and


frequented “Black Rookeries”; the Twelfth Presbyterian Church in Philadelphia


was presided over after 1837 by an Afro-American minister and baptismal records


for the next twenty years suggest that one-third of the members were Irish.13


But things rapidly changed and “instead of the Irish love of liberty warming


America,? the winds of republican slavery blew back to Ireland. The Irish had


faded from Green to white, bleached by, as Daniel O’Connell (head of IRA in 1920′


s and known throughout Ireland as ‘the Liberator’) put it, something in the


“atmosphere” of ?America?. Cornel West puts this ?atmosphere? into a clear


statement:


?Without the presence of black people in America, European-Americans would not


be ?white?-they would only be Irish, Italians, Poles, Welsh, and others engaged


in class, ethnic, and gender struggles over resources and identity…White


poverty could be ignored and whites’ paranoia of each other could be overlooked


primarily owing to the distinctive American feature: the basic racial divide of


black and white people.?14


This ?racial divide? is what caused the evolution of the black Civil


Rights movement. The Civil Rights Movement was the first mass movement to evolve


in the 60’s. But it was not the first time that African Americans had waged


struggle against racial oppression. It was the first time that a mass movement


emerged under a non-violent ideology. Slave revolts occurred on plantations and


even aboard the ships that brought them here from Africa. The Civil War happened


to take over the South, not to free the slaves. The northern government didn’t


really care about the slave so after the After the Civil War, African Americans


lived in a system of neo-apartheid in the South. Whites had developed a system


of oppression with total white economic control, exclusion on black people from


the political system, racial segregation and the general notion that blacks were


inferior to whites. Separate drinking fountains for whites and blacks. “Colored


balconies” in movie theaters. Seats in the back of the bus. It may be difficult


to believe these were examples of conditions in America less than 40 years ago.


The struggle to change these conditions, and to win equal protection under the


law for citizens of all races, formed the backdrop of the civil rights movement.


What follows is a brief, far from comprehensive timeline of the black civil


rights movement in the US.


In 1954 the momentous Brown vs. Board of Education U.S. Supreme Court,


banned segregation in public schools. The NAACP put this up in court and beat


the white supremacist laws down. Then in 1955 the murder of a black youth named


Emmett Till, for allegedly whistling at a white woman, triggered black an, for


the first time, placed white supremacy in the South in check. Also n 1955 the


bus boycott is launched in Montgomery, Alabama after Rosa Parks is arrested on


December 1 for refusing to give up her seat to a white person on the bus. She


was not the first to do this, but was the first to have received publicity for


it because she was the secretary for the local NAACP. In 1956 on December 21


after more than a year of boycotting the buses and a legal fight, the Montgomery


buses are desegregate. In 1957, At a previously all-white Central High, Little


Rock, Arkansas, 1,000 paratroopers are called by President Eisenhower to restore


order and escort ?The Little Rock Nine? to attend school.


In 1960, the sit-in protest movement begins in February at a Woolworth’s


lunch counter in Greensboro, North Carolina and spreads across the nation. The


Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee (SNCC) is formed at a meeting


organized by Rosa Parks. The SNCC would become a major force throughout the 1960′


s. Later, leaders like Stokely Carmichael, would lead blacks into the Black


Power Movement which was spawned from Malcom X and the urban ghettos. Then, in


1961 the ‘freedom rides’ begin from Washington, DC, where groups of black and


white people ride buses through the South to challenge segregation. Two people


are killed, many injured in riots in response to the freedom rides as James


Meredith is enrolled as the first black at University of Mississippi.


In 1963, police arrest Martin Luther King and many others demonstrating


in Birmingham, Alabama, then Bull Connor (police chief) orders fire hoses and


police dogs turned on the nonviolent marchers. That same year Medgar Evers,


NAACP leader, is murdered June 12 as he enters his home in Jackson, Mississippi.


250,000 people attend the March on Washington, DC urging support for pending


civil-rights legislation. The event was highlighted by King’s “I have a dream?


speech. On September 15th four girls killed in bombing of the Sixteenth Street


Baptist Church in Birmingham, Alabama. In1964, SNNC and much of the youth of


America are unable to agree on which ideology to follow: direct action or


revolutionary politics. Three civil-rights workers are murdered that year


leading to a more violent opposition by protesters. On July 2, president Johnson


signs the Civil Rights Act of 1964.


Malcolm X is murdered Feb. 21, 1965. On August 6. President Johnson


signs the Voting Rights Act of 1965. The act, which King and SNCC, registered


qualified voters and suspended devices such as literacy tests that aimed to


prevent African Americans from voting. During August 11-16 the Watts riots leave


34 dead in Los Angeles. Then in 1968 The Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. is


assassinated in Memphis, Tennessee, unleashing violence in more than 100 cities.


In order to diversify university enrollment priorities are given to


underrepresented minorities.


In more resent years, the U.S. Supreme Court outlaws racial quotas in a


suit brought by Allan Bakke, a white man who had been turned down by the medical


school at University of California, Davis.1989 Douglas Wilder of Virginia


becomes the nation’s first African American to be elected state governor. Four


years ago, in 1992, the first racially based riots in years erupt in Los Angeles


and other cities after a jury acquits LA police officers in the videotape


beating of Rodney King, a black man.


The Civil Rights Movement made some changes except they all seem to fall


short when we look at their results today. The movement was happening in the


midst of war over ideology (capitalist vs. socialist) and people felt the need


to stick with their country even if it didn’t them serve them and exploited them.


The US government continual undermined the movement while it pretended to be


helping it. Many of the people involved put their faith in the system and never


thought of a revolution to change the system. From the Montgomery bus boycott to


the sit-ins to the violent rebellions, black people are still not equal to


whites.


?Black infants die in America at twice the rate of white infants. (Despite the


increased numbers of the middle class blacks, the rates are diverging, with


black rates actually rising.) One out of every two black children lives below


the poverty line (as compared with one out of every seven white children).


Nearly four times as many black families exist below the poverty line as white


families. More than 50 percent of African American families have incomes below


$25,000 dollars. Among black youth under age twenty, death by murder occurs


nearly ten times as often as among whites. Over 60 percent of birth to black


mothers occur out of wedlock , more than four time the rate of white mothers.


The net worth of the typical white household is ten times that of the typical


black household. In many states, five to ten times as many blacks as whites age


eighteen to thirty are in prison.?15


Although the US civil rights movement sparked advantageous legislation


to be passed, data exhibits that the inner-city, of our country are more


hazardous and deplorable residences then ever. The rates of poverty,


unemployment, serious crime, single-female headed families, welfare dependency


and non-marriage child birth have continued to rise until reaching the combat


zones of today. These bullet hole and blood spattered places are growing and are


now four to five times bigger than their original sizes in almost all major


cities of the United States.16


Death has become an accepted, even expected result of life in the ghetto.


In North Richmond and other places like it, children live a life of want, of


deeply segregated and ill equipped schools, of gang violence and limited hope.


Young men, some as young as 11 and 12, accept with shrugging shoulders that


reaching adulthood is not a guarantee. Violent expiration is the swift


undercurrent of poverty and hopelessness: it has become an inartistic trait


absorbed seamlessly into the weave of culture.17


Killing or being killed are the ultimate signs of status. Those who kill


command the most respect. Those who die are revered and memorialized beyond


anything they could hope for in life, which isn’t much, considering only a small


group of people will treasure their short lives; they truly become ‘just another


statistic’. In the slum a pager beacons the message of death: three numbers- 187


those three numbers are self explanatory, their appearance chilling. They


represent the penal code designation for murder as well as who is marked for


assassination on the street. It is written on the walls. It gives the music its


beat. In the ghetto; death is life.


Poverty, oppression, and colonization all produce violence and


oppression. According to Munoz the only difference between external and internal


colonization is the legal status of the colony. A colony can be considered ?


internal? if the colonized people has the same formal legal status as any other


group of citizens, and external if it is placed in a separate legal category.18


According to this definition, African Americans are an internally colonized


people while Northern Ireland is an external colony. Both are oppressed people


living under exploited conditions maintained by maintained by discriminatory


legislation, exclusion from the political system, segregation and violence.


Neither has control over the institutions which affect their lives. The result


is a community that find itself unhappy, powerless and it people are regarded as


second class citizens.


From Ireland to America the movements failed to resolve most of the


problems they faced. The question is, why? Both movements had the same goal of


freedom and equality. Both movements used nonviolent as well as violence to


achieve their goals. The nonviolence worked better then the violence in both


countries, but the results still fell short of what the people need. Both


protesters had internal ideological differences which weakened their sprit and


results. Both groups were ‘lead to the far left’ and back again with a group of


former participants fighting it all the time. Their communist ideas where not


supported by the rest of the populous and this stifled their results. The people


of the western world have a very negative view of socialism and without the


populations support the movement would die. Both organizations gave up on


communism and went back to just plain violence and rioting. All their many


protests failed because the effectiveness of protests depended on the good faith


of the government. That good faith was not there then, it is still not there


today. Laws might of been past to stop the unrest, but laws do not always mean


change in a colonial system.


To contrast the two movements, besides the obvious religion vs. race,


external vs. internal colonization and Britain vs. the United States. The


outside views of the movements were probably the main difference that had any


affects on the movements. The IRA has always been seen as a terrorist


organization rather than a revolutionary one while the most radical Civil Rights


organizations in America were always seen as just radical groups. Another


important difference to note is the Irish have had very little help from the


outside while the American movement had many financial supporters. The cultural


differences of both of the oppressing countries also affected the treatment of


the people that were incarcerated during the movements. The British government


was more open in its outright assassination of movement leader than the US was.


The FBI and its CIONTEL program was much more secretive in its sabotage of Civil


Right s organizations than the British Army. Both Civil Rights Movements showed


that social change could be made by a mass of unskilled, resource-less, people.


Even if the changes were small, at least it allowed associations to see that a


transformation could be accomplished.


You will not find a ’solution’ in the past; maybe the beginning of a


path, but everyone must be willing to walk down it . Only the people of today


can change things for the better. History simply shows us how the problem(s)


came into being and how the people became what they are. Other disciplines such


as psychology, sociology, economics, and even plain common sense may help but in


the end human beings in society, as in their private lives, have to work thing


out for themselves. We all have a measure choice when it comes to altering


their own personal lives.


If blame is to be appointed for today’s situation in Ireland as well as


America, it should be laid not on the heads of men of today but of history. If a


personal villain is sought then perhaps it should be placed on the successive


governments of Britain and America who, racked by past events, aborted their


responsibilities in Northern Ireland and the ghettos of America. We are all


prisoners of history and the views we have learned from it.


History is a difficult prison to escape from and the history of America


and Ireland are as difficult as any. The Civil Rights Movements were a brief


moment of looking past prison walls and coming to the realization of change. But


it didn’t last long. As the ‘black rage’ and “white backlash” increased in

Сохранить в соц. сетях:
Обсуждение:
comments powered by Disqus

Название реферата: Bleeding Ireland And Black America Essay Research

Слов:5253
Символов:35262
Размер:68.87 Кб.