РефератыИностранный языкAnAn Analysis Of The Two

An Analysis Of The Two

“Monsters” Essay, Research Paper


GRENDEL & FRANKENSTEIN


AN ANALYSIS OF THE TWO “MONSTERS” AND THEIR SUPERIORITY TO


MANKIND


GRENDEL & FRANKENSTEIN


AN ANALYSIS OF THE TWO “MONSTERS” AND THEIR SUPERIORITY TO


MANKIND In


the desert


I saw a creature, naked, bestial,


Who, squatting upon the ground,


Held his heart in his hands,


And ate of it.


I said, “Is it good friend?”


“It is bitter-bitter,” he answered;


“But I like it


Because it is bitter


And because it is my heart.”


-Stephen Crane


This reflects how both Grendel and Frankenstein must have felt during


their lonely lives. “Seeking friends, the fiends found enemies; seeking


hope, they found hate”(Neilson back page). The monsters simply want to


live as the rest of us live. But, in our prejudice of their kind, we


banish them from our elite society. Who gave society the right to judge


who is acceptable and who is not? A better question might be, who is


going to stop them? The answer, no one. Therefore, society continues to


alienate the undesirables of our community. Some of the greatest minds


of all time have been socially unacceptable. Albert Einstein lived alone


and rarely wore the same color socks. Van Gogh found comfort only in


his art, and the woman who consistently denied his passion. Edgar Allen


Poe was “different” to say the least. Just like these great men,


Grendel and Frankenstein do not conform to the societal model. Also


like these men, Grendel and Frankenstein are uniquely superior to the


rest of


mankind. Their superiority is seen through their guile to live in a


society that ostracizes their kind, their true heroism in place of


society’s romantic view, and the ignorance on which society’s opinion of


them is formed.


Grendel, though he needs to kill to do so, functions very well in his


own sphere. Grendel survives in a hostile climate where he is hated and


feared by all. He lives in a cave protected by firesnakes so as to


physically, as well as spiritually, separate himself from the society


that detests, yet admires, him. Grendel is “the brute existent by which


[humankind] learns to define itself”(Gardner 73). Hrothgar’s thanes


continually try to extinguish Grendel’s infernal rage, while he simply


wishes to live in harmony with them.


Like Grendel, Frankenstein also learns to live in a society that


despises his kind. Frankenstein also must kill, but this is only in


response to the people’s abhorrence of him. Ironically, the very doctor


who bore him now searches the globe seeking Frankenstein’s destruction.


Even the ever-loving paternal figure now turns away from this outcast


from society. Frankenstein journeys to the far reaches of the world to


escape from the societal ills that cause society to hate him. He


ventures to the harshest, most desolate, most uninhabitable place known


to man, the north pole. He lives in isolation, in the cold acceptance


of the icy glaciers. Still, Dr. Frankenstein follows, pushing his


creation to the edge of the world, hoping he would fall off, never to be


seen or heard from again. Frankenstein flees from his father until the


Doctor’s death, where


Frankenstein joins his father in the perpetual, silent acceptance of


death.


Frankenstein never makes an attempt to become one with society, yet he


is finally accepted by the captain to whom he justifies his existence.


Frankenstein tracks Dr. Frankenstein as to better explain to himself the


nature of own being by understanding the life of his creator.


“Unstoppable, [Frankenstein] travels to the ends of the earth to destroy


[his] creator, by destroying everyone [Dr.] Frankenstein loved” (Shelley


afterword). As the captain listens to Frankenstein’s story, he begins


to understand his plight. He accepts Frankenstein as a reluctant, yet


devoted, servant to his master. Granted that Frankenstein does not


“belong,” he is accepted with admiration by the captain. The respect


that Frankenstein has longed for is finally given to him as he announces


his suicide in the name of his father, the late Dr. Frankenstein.


On the other hand, Grendel makes numerous attempts to assimilate into


society, but he is repeatedly turned back. Early in his life, Grendel


dreams of associating with Hrothgar’s great warriors. Nightly, Grendel


goes down to the meadhall to listen to Hrothgar’s stories and the


thanes’ heroism, but most of all, he comes to hear the Shaper. The


Shaper’s stories are Grendel’s only education as they enlighten him to


the history of the society that he yearns to join. “[The Shaper]


changed the world, had torn up its past by its thick gnarled roots and


had transmuted it, and they, who knew the truth, remembered it his way-


and so did [Grendel]“(Gardner 43). Upon


Grendel’s first meeting with Hrothgar, the great hero tries to kill him


by chopping him out of a tree. “The king (Hrothgar) snatches an ax from


the man beside him and, without any warning, he hurls it at


[Grendel]“(Gardner 27). After being attacked by those he so admires, he


turns against them to wreak havoc on their civilization.


The more that society alienates Grendel and Frankenstein, the more they


come to realize the invalidity of “social heroism.” As Grendel’s


oppressors see it, heroism consists of the protection of one’s name, the


greater glory of their line, and most of all, their armor collection.


“Beowulf, so movingly compounded with self-vindication, looks to care


for his own name and honour”(Morgan xxxi-xxxii). According to


Frankenstein’s time, a hero is someone who protects their lady’s name,


earns greater glory for themselves and their country, and has a large


collection of prestigious degrees to hang on their walls. Social


heroism is not a single event, it is properly defined as a


“revolution.” It is an on-going, ever-changing series of “heroic”


events. This “revolution is not the substitution of immoral for moral,


or of illegitimate violence for legitimate violence; it is simply the


pitting of power against power, [hero against hero,] where the issue is


freedom for the winners and enslavement of the rest”(Gardner 119). This


revolution is built on intimidation by the powerful of society to


oppress the undesirables. “Murder and mayhem are the life and soul of


[the] revolution”(Gardner 118).


This revolution is most evident in John Gardner’s Grendel. In


Hrothgar’s meadhall, his thanes are discussing the heroic revolution


with the Shaper. According to the Shaper, the kingdom, those in power,


pretends to be protecting the values of all people. Supposedly, the


revolution causes the kingdom to


save the values of the community-regulate compromise- improve the


quality of the commonwealth. In other words, protect the power of the


people in power and repress the rest? [It] rewards people who fit the


System best. The King’s immediate thanes, the thanes’ top servants, and


so on till you come to the people that don’t fit in at all. No


problem. Drive them to the darkest corners of the kingdom, starve


them, arrest and execute a few, or put them out to war. That’s how it


works. (Gardner 118)


In Grendel’s time, violence is the common denominator in all


righteousness. “The incitement to violence depends upon total


transvaluation of the ordinary values. By a single stroke, the most


criminal acts may be converted to heroic and meritorious deeds”(Gardner


117). Certainly the only difference between appalling acts of violence


and heroic deeds is the matter of who commits them. What might be


appropriate for a king would be unheard of by a peasant. This is


obviously a social commentary that fits today as well, if not better,


than it did then. The rich and powerful still succeed in oppressing the

p>

poor and helpless in every culture around the world. “If the Revolution


[ever] comes to grief, it will be because [the powerful] have become


alarmed at [their] own brutality”(Gardner 117). Then, as the rich


descend, the poor will rise


to power in order to complete the revolution. “The total ruin of


institutions and [heroism] is [in itself] an act of creation”(Gardner


118). To break the circle would cause “evolution,” forward progress,


that would enhance the natural progress of mankind. But, according to


Gardner, this will never happen because the powerful enjoy their present


state of grace; and when they helpless rise up, they are immediately


repressed in a “cry [of] common good”(Gardner 119).


Though not as overt as Grendel, the concept of “revolution” is also


displayed in Frankenstein. Frankenstein’s society ostracizes its


undesirables by chasing them to the darkest corners of the world in much


the same way that Grendel’s society does. Frankenstein is driven from


his birthplace by his creator only to find that he must hide in shadowed


allies to avoid social persecution. In the theme of revolution, the


rich control what is acceptable, and to them, Frankenstein definitely


does not fit the mold. Next, Frankenstein seeks asylum in the barn of a


small farmer. The place where he finds refuge is a cold, dark corner


symbolic of how society forces the non-elite from their spheres to


places where they cannot be seen, nor heard, and therefore do not


exist. After Frankenstein saves the starving family by harvesting their


crops, they repay him by running him off their land. This incident


repeats itself throughout Frankenstein’s journeys. Finally,


Frankenstein is forced into the cold wasteland of the Arctic circle. In


this uninhabitable place there is no one to persecute him. Yet the


doctor maliciously continues to follow Frankenstein, hoping to


completely destroy his creation. When Dr.


Frankenstein dies, his monster is the first to come to lay his body to


rest and follow him into the afterlife.


Frankenstein fits the idea of a true hero, rather than the romantic


view of heroism shared by society. He is chivalrous, loyal, and true to


himself. Frankenstein shows his chivalry by helping a family in need


and still accepting their hatred of him. He acts to help others


although he receives nothing in return. Frankenstein holds absolute


loyalty to his creator. Dr. Frankenstein shuns his creation,


Frankenstein, and devotes his life to killing the monster, yet


Frankenstein is the first to show respect to his fallen master after his


death. Frankenstein builds a funeral pyre to honor his master and


creator who despised him during his life. Frankenstein’s loyalty


extends as far as the ritual suicide he commits while cremating the body


of his creator. Most importantly, Frankenstein is true to himself.


Society wishes that he would cease to exist, so their opinion is


irrelevant to him. His creator shuns him, but Frankenstein learns to


cope with his own emotions in order to support himself. Frankenstein


relies solely on what he believes in, not in what society believes to be


important. His actions are based upon his own assessment of situations,


rather than what is socially acceptable.


Grendel is also isolated from society, and his actions also classify


him as a true hero. Like Frankenstein, Grendel has little outside


influence and has to rely on his own emotions to make decisions.


Grendel possesses bravery, yet he does not have the foolish pride of


Beowulf. “The first virtue [of heroism] is bravery,


but even more, it is blind courage”(Nicholson 47). Grendel is the


epitome of “blind courage.” For example, when the bull attacks Grendel,


he simply calculates the bull’s movements and fearlessly moves out of


the way. Even when the bull rips through his leg, Grendel is not


afraid. Grendel repeatedly charges into the meadhall and destroys its


best warriors without a second thought. Grendel even has the courage to


taunt Hrothgar’s bravest thanes by throwing apples at them. Grendel


“breaks up their wooden gods like kindling and topples their gods of


stone”(Gardner 128). It is this type of “blind courage” that Grendel


believes saves his life in battle. “Fate will often spare a man if his


courage holds”(Gardner 162). Beowulf, on the other hand, is foolish in


his approach to battle. He goes to fight an immortal opponent, the


dragon, and is killed because of his pride. “His very valor, wisdom, and


magnanimity, expended unstindtly, lead only to a hero’s grave in a land


soon to be conquered”(Brodeur 105). Grendel’s “blind courage” is far


superior to the “blind stupidity” of Beowulf.


Just as society’s heroes fight foolishly, their opinions are made by


prejudice and reflect the ignorance of humankind. Both monsters are


seen as the minions of evil, and even of Satan himself. “Grendel is


placed in a Biblical lineage of evil reaching back to the first


murder”(Hamilton 105). Even the author of the poem alludes to “the


descent of the race of Grendel from Cain”(Donaldson 1688). Frankenstein


is proposed to be of “accursed origin”(Milton 130). However, neither of


the two can be properly defined as Satanic,


especially on the information known to the rest of society. Continuing,


this belief causes extended prejudice of the monsters even in our


society today.


Through the predetermined opinions of society, Grendel is seen as an


evil come to destroy all of mankind. Grendel is a victim of society,


he was not born inherently evil. “Woe to him who is compelled, through


cruel persecution, to thrust his soul into the embrace of fire, to hope


for no solace”(Kennedy 9). Society unduly restrains Grendel to heinous


stereotypes that he does not fit. For example, another character more


closely fits the description of Cain than Grendel. “The only one of the


personages of the poem who is clearly said to be destined to suffer in


hell is Unferth, who, in his responsibility for the death of his


brothers, has committed the sin of Cain”(Brodeur 218). Clearly, it is


not Grendel that should be condemned. He only tries to assimilate into


society, but after being continually rejected he turns to violence in


response to society’s hatred of him.


Similar to Grendel, Frankenstein is also pictured as satanic. Brooks


concurs in saying that society “views [Frankenstein] to be a unique


creation, like Adam ‘united by no link to any other being in


existence’(Milton 129), yet by his condition more resembling


Satan”(210). “There are times when he scarcely seems to be of this


earth”(Venables 59). Also like Grendel, Frankenstein was not born evil,


he was forced into his way of life by the society that rejected him.


After this rejection, Frankenstein “like the arch-fiend, bore a


hell within him”(Shelley 136). To each man his own god, and to each man


his own devil as well. Frankenstein, “like Coleridge’s wedding guest,


leaves ‘a sadder and wiser man’”(Scott 201). He now better understands


his existence and how society wrongfully rejects it. Frankenstein


simply wants society to have the “knowledge that might enable [him] to


make them overlook the deformity of [his] figure”(Shelley 114). “Man?


how ignorant art thou in thy pride of wisdom!”(Shelley 201).


Grendel’s and Frankenstein’s superiority to humankind is made obvious


by their ability to live in a society that has ostracized them, the


monsters’ true heroism in place of humankind’s romantic view, and the


ignorance on which society’s opinion of the monsters is based. “The


monsters not only embody our fears of the way certain entities can


artificially pervert nature in ourselves and our society, they also


speak to us knowledgeably of nature and in a human voice, to tell us we


need not be afraid [of them]“(Scott


201).

Сохранить в соц. сетях:
Обсуждение:
comments powered by Disqus

Название реферата: An Analysis Of The Two

Слов:2772
Символов:18745
Размер:36.61 Кб.