РефератыИностранный языкWhWho Is To Blame For The Downfall

Who Is To Blame For The Downfall

Of Macbeth Essay, Research Paper


Who really was to


blame for the downfall of Macbeth? Was it himself, his wife; Lady Macbeth or


the Witches? Firstly I will look at all the murders which lead up to the death


of Macbeth, then I will assess each of the three individuals before


concluding my information.Norwegians &


Traitors They were killed


during battle by Macbeth and Banquo and the Scottish army. Macbeth & Banquo


were fighting for King and Country with no fear of wrong doing. Totally different


to the other ?unlawful? killings which were actually murders; the killing


of the Norwegians was not murder but a battle. Scotland were totally out


numbered and were the underdogs yet they still ?Doubly redoubled stakes upon


the foe.?King Duncan Arguably the most


important killing because it is the first premeditated cold blooded killing in


the play. The first ?unlawful? killing that Macbeth committed and one which he


later regrets. This is the killing which leads to the whole string of murders


under Macbeth. Macbeth calls it ?the horrid deed? because he does not really


want to kill his king (?most sacrilegious murder?) but it is the only way he will


become king. This killing also involves greatly Lady Macbeth because of


the way she planned it and helped in its execution and cover up.The Two Grooms Macbeth?s second


killing almost immediately after the murder of King Duncan which ruins the plan


of Lady Macbeth to frame them. It is an illogical and pointless killing


which points the finger at Macbeth for the killing of King Duncan. It is a messy


murder in public view and is the only one in which everybody knows


Macbeth has done it. The grooms had been drugged so the couldn?t remember


what had happened the night before so if Macbeth had not killed them the would


not have known themselves if they had done it. It is an untidy death and a


key event in the downfall of Macbeth.Banquo Another murder that


was this time instigated by Macbeth but Banquo was actually murdered by


two men from the dregs of society hired by Macbeth. A killing which is


intended to cover up Macbeth?s previous killings because he thinks Banquo knows.


A very cowardly killing in which Banquo and his young son Fleance are


ambushed with little chance of survival. Fleance should also have been killed but


Banquo sacrificed his life to help him get away. Again this is a messy


killing because Fleance gets away, ? Fleance his son? ?must embrace the


fate of that dark hour?.Macduff?s Family Probably the messiest


murder because of the cold hearted, blood thirsty and spiteful way it is


carried out. It was a? needless killing


which could do nothing but implicate


Macbeth, who was warned of Macduff by the apparitions: ?Macbeth! Macbeth!


Macbeth! Beware Macduff, beware the thane of Fife.? But then Macbeth is


reassured by another apparition that tells him; ?none of women born Shall harm


Macbeth?. This cause Macbeth to say ? Then lives Macduff: what need I


fear of thee?? But when he hears


that Macduff has fled to England he decides to slaughter ?his wife, his babes,


and all unfortunate soul that trace him in his line.?? This murder shows how


Macbeth changes throughout the play into a more confident and brutal


man. He loses all his conscience and no longer worries about the


implications of his deeds. Who is to Blame?Macbeth In the battle at the


beginning of the play Macbeth?s violence against the Norwegians earns him


high praise from King Duncan. In this scene King Duncan also announces


his decision to pass the throne on to his son. This news angers Macbeth


who himself wishes too take the crown. This is the first event when Macbeth


shows his desire to be king. Macbeth though also recognises King


Duncan as a great king, King Duncan has just made Macbeth the thane of


Cawdor; ?hath been so clear in his great office.? But when he meets the


Witches for the first time he shows his desire to overthrow his king


and become king himself: ?Macbeth! That shall be king hereafter.? Macbeth?s


reaction to this prophecy makes it clear that he is intrigued by what


they have to say. Witches in the 1500-1600?s were taken very seriously and in


fact during this period more Witches we killed than in any other. Today we


look at Witches? ?tongue in cheek? because of the factual scientific age in


which we live, but in the period of Macbeth when people believed in the


supernatural such prophecies were taken very seriously.? At this point it is


hard for him to see how he can become king without killing King Duncan, which he


does not want to do. When he writes home to his wife, Lady Macbeth,


<
p>he realises that killing King Duncan does not seem so hard because of an


imminent visit from King Duncan. It is this belief from his wife and her plan


which gives Macbeth the confidence to kill King Duncan. From this point


onwards Macbeth really thinks that he can get away with it and his desire grows,


he becomes foolish and blinded of the later repercussions. Banquo


makes light of the matter and almost seems to laugh that Macbeth is


taking this so seriosly. The Witches also prophesise that Banquo?s children


will be kings. ?If chance will have me king, why chance may crown me, without


my stir.? Is what Macbeth first says but after King Duncan?s decision to


make Malcolm king he is pushed towards a more evil way of achieving his


goal; ?Stars hide your fires! Let not light see my black and deep desires.?The Witches? They were taken very


seriously in the 17th century and were seen as mysterious and evil


agents of the devil. In the play they have various powers in which they curse


and summon the apparitions. At the start they seem to be the most evil


characters but they do not actually kill anyone. They only make three appearances in


the whole play in which they actually have a tremendous influence.


They instigate the murder and influence Macbeth into killing King Duncan.


They have a strong entry in which pathetic fallacy echoes chaos in the


weather through the storm. Their power is stronger at the start as they seek


out Macbeth but by the end Macbeth has grown more confident and less


fearful of the Witches and actually seeks them out. He has actually become more


of a devils agent than they are throughout the play. They witches actually


set out to create chaos but actually end causing serious damage to the


monarchy and important people in Scotland.Macbeth & Witches They only meet three


times but the difference between these meetings is immense: In the 1st Meeting


They ambush Macbeth and Banquo on their return from battle. Macbeth is


?rapt? by their news but especially when the prediction thatb he will become Thane


of Cawdor comes true. After this he actually believes that what they say is


true. He decides to leave it to fate but eventually he takes matters into


his own hands. In the final meeting


Macbeth actually seeks them out and demands information, in the


form of the apparitions. Macbeth is actually now more evil than the witches, and


to their defence, like Lady Macbeth do not actually kill anyone.Lady Macbeth Traditional view: She


is the worst villainess in English literature. But when Macbeth was written,


in the 1600?s, a woman?s role in a marriage/relationship would be to support


her partner, bear and raise children and to look after household matters. So


in these duties Lady Macbeth would have been seen as a good supporting


house wife although there is no real mention of children except when Lady


Macbeth says ?Have plucked my nipple from his boneless gums. And dashed his


brains out.? Modern view: Nowadays


Lady Macbeth is seen, especially by feminists as an empowered woman -


even the heroine of the play. She arguably does nothing wrong, she just takes


the initiative in trying to get what is best for her and her husband (Macbeth).


?you shall put this nights great business into my despatch.? She knows that the


only way to make Macbeth truly happy is for him to become king,


so she helps him to forget his conscience ?a little water clears us of this


deed.?? She uses her sexuality to get


through to Macbeth and take control over him


?Hie thee hither, that I may pour my spirits in thine ear, and chastise with the


valour of my tongue.? She knows that this will win him over, she has sexual


power over him. Another modern


psychological view: Lady Macbeth has a lack of foresight which is similar to


that of a child. She wants something so badly that she doesn?t really think


what she is doing, like when a child is enticed by a stranger into a car


for sweets in the modern day. She is very unlike


her husband because he regrets the murder straight away unlike her who thinks


?a little water clears us of this deed?. Macbeth says ?this is a sorry sight.? Because of this way


in which she does not see the consequences of her actions she breaks


down and becomes ill before dying? just


prior to the end of the play.Conclusion I believe that no one


is solely to blame because, as I have explained in my essay there are many


key factors in the downfall of Macbeth. If you were to take any one


characters role out of the play I don?t believe that any of the murders would have


taken place and hence Macbeth would not have become king and fallen to


defeat.

Сохранить в соц. сетях:
Обсуждение:
comments powered by Disqus

Название реферата: Who Is To Blame For The Downfall

Слов:1758
Символов:11029
Размер:21.54 Кб.