РефератыИностранный языкJuJung Soo Kim Essay Research Paper name

Jung Soo Kim Essay Research Paper name

Jung Soo Kim Essay, Research Paper


name = Jung Soo Kim


email = dennis138@Juno.com


publish = yes


subject = History


title = Reasons on why Napoleon had lost the Campaign of 1812


papers = Please put your paper here.


Napoleon’s Reasons for Defeat


The Campaign of 1812 should have been a another crusade for Napoleon,


but he now faced 2 new policies that he had never faced before, the severe Russian


winter and the notorious scorched-earth policy. On June 23, 1812 Napoleon’s


Grande Armee, over 500,000 men strong, poured over the Russian border. An


equal amount of Russian forces awaited them. The result of the campaign was a


surprise. Two authors, General carl von Clausewitz and Brett James, show


similarities in reasons why Napoleon had lost this campaign to Russia.


Napoleon believed that after a few quick victorious battles, he could


convince Alexander to return to the Continental System. He also decided that if he


occupied Moscow, the Russian government would crumple and ask for peace.


” A single blow delivered at the heart of the Russian Empire, at Moscow the Great,


at Moscow the Holy, will instantly put this whole blind, apathetic mass at my


mercy.” pg 6, 1812 Napoleon’s Defeat in Russia


This was his belief he expressed in March 1812. However, when Napoleon


eventually took over Moscow, the Tsar still did not surrender. Napoleon, sent a


message to the Tsar, demanding a immediate surrender. However, the Tsar could


not surrender because if he did, he would be assassinated by the nobles.


Clausewitz replies by saying, ” Napoleon was unable to grasp the fact that


Alexander would not, could not negotiate. The Tsar knew well that he would be


disposed and assassinated if he tried so.” pg 256, The Campaign of 1812 in


Russia


General Clausewitz said, “Napoleon believed if he defeated the Russian Army and


occupied Moscow, the Russian leadership will fall apart and the government


would call for peace.” pg 253, The Campaign of 1812 in Russia


Brett James also agreed that Napoleon’s occupation had no result. ” The


occupation of Napoleon in Moscow did not have a effect on the government.” pg


13, 1812 Napoleon’s Defeat in Russia


With his battle plan set, Napoleon prepared his troops for the attack on


Russia. But, Napoleon did not consider the fierce Russian winter which awaited


him. According to Ludwig Wilhelm Gottlob Schlosser, a onlooker, he described


the army by saying,


” The French, down to the lowliest drummer were very fastidious. These poor


French devils were not satisfied with less than soup, meat and vegetables, roast,


and salad for their midday meal, and there was no sign of their famous frugality.


They were completely devoid of the coming winter.” pg 13, 1812 Napoleon’s


Defeat in Russia


Napoleon was even warned by General Rapp about the extremities of the


oncoming winter in Russia.


” The natives say we shall have a severe winter,” Napoleon retorted scornfully, ”


Bah! You and your natives! We shall see how fine it is.” pg 147, 1812


Napoleon’s Defeat in Russia


Napoleon should have heeded Rapp’s words. As the Grand Armee marched toward


Moscow, many horses and men were lost in the freezing snow, and for those who


remained, their morale and effectiveness was at the nadir.


General Clausewitz states his point by saying, ” With more precaution and better


regulations as to subsistence, with more careful consideration of his marches,


which would have prevented the unnecessary and enormous accumulat

ion of


masses on one and the same road, he would have preserved his army in a more


effective condition.” pg 255, The Campaign of 1812 in Russia


Brett James also shared the same opinion, ” Napoleon appeared to have made no


effort to discover the facts in Russia, or prepare his troops for it.” pg 140, 1812


Napoleon’s Defeat in Russia


As Napoleon and his army was making their way to Moscow, they


encountered typhus, colds, and dysentery. Even the mighty Napoleon had caught


a mild case of the flu. However, his soldiers had received the brunt of the attack.


Captain Thomas- Joesph Aubry relives this ordeal, ” After this the typhus made


appalling inroads in our ranks. We were fourty-three officers in our ward. All of


them died, one after the other, and delirious from this dreadful disease, most of


them singing, some in Latin, others in German, others again in Italian – and singing


psalms, canticles, or the mass.” pg 210, 1812 Napoleon’s Defeat in Russia


General Clausewitz wrote, ” The bad water and the air-borne insects caused


dysentery, typhus, and diarrhea.” pg 136, The Campaign of 1812 in Russia


Brett James also wrote, ” Bad water, bad air, and bad sanitation all contributed to


the vile diseases.” pg 213 1812, Napoleon’s defeat in Russia


Napoleon had lost about 80,000 men altogether from diseases alone. But there


were some remedies for the sick, doctors provided gruel for the dysentery and


warm soup for the colds. Napoleon could have lowered the casualties if he had


brought more doctors and more supplies.


When Napoleon had finally reached Moscow, he discovered it deserted.


Two days later, a great fire broke out in Moscow, temporarily forcing Napoleon


and some of his troops out of Moscow. If Napoleon had reached Moscow with at


300,000 men instead of 90,000, he could have continued his campaign and defeat


the weakened Russian army. The Emperor could have reached Moscow with at


least 300,000 men if he had taken better care of his troops and had not fought


every battle that he came across. Brett James shows that Napoleon regarded his


army as mere numbers and did not contemplate that they would be affected by


hunger and fatigue.


” He would not have lost a 100,000 men if he had not chosen on every occasion to


take the bull by the horns.” pg 86, 1812 Napoleon’s Defeat in Russia


” Moscow was a good weeks march away, but already the army was already


disintegrating through sheer hunger.” pg 147, 1812 Napoleon’s Defeat in Russia


General Clausewitz also relates with Brett by declaring, ” He reached Moscow


with 90,000 men, he should have reached it with 300,000. This would have


happened if he treated his army with more care and forbearance.” pg 255, The


Campaign of 1812 in Russia


If Napoleon only had at least 300,000 men, he could have waited for supplies


with the comfort of knowing that he was safe. Instead, Napoleon retreated and


allowed his army to slowly wither under the attack of the Russian guerrillas.


Therefore I have shown some reasons why Napoleon had lost the


Campaign of 1812 to Russia. However, Napoleon did not lose the war out of


military errors but of a simple miscalculation – a miscalculation that was made by


Hitler a century later. Napoleon believed that if he occupied Moscow, the Russian


government would collapse and he would rule Europe with little opposition. But


as history reveals, this tactic does not work and Napoleon is defeated, paving the


way for other nations to deny Napoleon’s lust for power.


by Jung Soo Kim


a.k.a Dennis

Сохранить в соц. сетях:
Обсуждение:
comments powered by Disqus

Название реферата: Jung Soo Kim Essay Research Paper name

Слов:1286
Символов:8393
Размер:16.39 Кб.