РефератыИностранный языкHaHamlet 3 Essay Research Paper Elizabethan Revenge

Hamlet 3 Essay Research Paper Elizabethan Revenge

Hamlet 3 Essay, Research Paper


Elizabethan Revenge in Hamlet-


Hamlet is a play written by William Shakespeare that very


closely follows the dramatic conventions of revenge in Elizabethan


theater. All revenge tragedies originally stemmed from the Greeks, who


wrote and performed the first plays. After the Greeks came Seneca who


was very influential to all Elizabethan tragedy writers. Seneca who


was Roman, basically set all of the ideas and the norms for all


revenge play writers in the Renaissance era including William


Shakespeare. The two most famous English revenge tragedies written in


the Elizabethan era were Hamlet, written by Shakespeare and The


Spanish Tragedy, written by Thomas Kyd. These two plays used mostly


all of the Elizabethan conventions for revenge tragedies in their


plays. Hamlet especially incorporated all revenge conventions in one


way or another, which truly made Hamlet a typical revenge play.


Shakespeare s Hamlet is one of many heroes of the Elizabethan and


Jacobean stage who finds himself grievously wronged by a powerful


figure, with no recourse to the law, and with a crime against his


family to avenge.


Seneca was among the greatest authors of classical tragedies


and there was not one educated Elizabethan who was unaware of him or


his plays. There were certain stylistic and different strategically


thought out devices that Elizabethan playwrights including Shakespeare


learned and used from Seneca s great tragedies. The five act


structure, the appearance of some kind of ghost, the one line


exchanges known as stichomythia, and Seneca s use of long rhetorical


speeches were all later used in tragedies by Elizabethan playwrights.


Some of Seneca s ideas were originally taken from the Greeks when the


Romans conquered Greece, and with it they took home many Greek


theatrical ideas. Some of Seneca s stories that originated from the


Greeks like Agamemnon and Thyestes which dealt with bloody family


histories and revenge captivated the Elizabethans. Seneca s stories


weren t really written for performance purposes, so if English


playwrights liked his ideas, they had to figure out a way to make the


story theatrically workable, relevant and exciting to the Elizabethan


audience who were very demanding. Seneca s influence formed part of a


developing tradition of tragedies whose plots hinge on political


power, forbidden sexuality, family honor and private revenge. There


was no author who exercised a wider or deeper influence upon the


Elizabethan mind or upon the Elizabethan form of tragedy than did


Seneca. For the dramatists of Renaissance Italy, France and England,


classical tragedy meant only the ten Latin plays of Seneca and not


Euripides, Aeschylus and Sophocles. Hamlet is certainly not much like


any play of Seneca s one can name, but Seneca is undoubtedly one of


the effective ingredients in the emotional charge of Hamlet. Hamlet


without Seneca is inconceivable.


During the time of Elizabethan theater, plays about tragedy


and revenge were very common and a regular convention seemed to be


formed on what aspects should be put into a typical revenge tragedy.


In all revenge tragedies first and foremost, a crime is committed and


for various reasons laws and justice cannot punish the crime so the


individual who is the main character, goes through with the revenge in


spite of everything. The main character then usually had a period of


doubt , where he tries to decide whether or not to go through with the


revenge, which usually involves tough and complex planning. Other


features that were typical were the appearance of a ghost, to get the


revenger to go through with the deed. The revenger also usually had a


very close relationship with the audience through soliloquies and


asides. The original crime that will eventually be avenged is nearly


always sexual or violent or both. The crime has been committed against


a family member of the revenger. The revenger places himself outside


the normal moral order of things, and often becomes more isolated as


the play progresses-an isolation which at its most extreme becomes


madness. The revenge must be the cause of a catastrophe and the


beginning of the revenge must start immediately after the crisis.


After the ghost persuades the revenger to commit his deed, a


hesitation first occurs and then a delay by the avenger before killing


the murderer, and his actual or acted out madness. The revenge must be


taken out by the revenger or his trusted accomplices. The revenger and


his accomplices may also die at the moment of success or even during


the course of revenge.


It should not be assumed that revenge plays parallel the moral


expectations of the Elizabethan audience. Church, State and the


regular morals of people in that age did not accept revenge, instead


they thought that revenge would simply not under any circumstances be


tolerated no matter what the original deed was. It is repugnant on


theological grounds, since Christian orthodoxy posits a world ordered


by Divine Providence, in which revenge is a sin and a blasphemy,


endangering the soul of the revenger. The revenger by taking law into


his own hands was in turn completely going against the total political


authority of the state. People should therefore never think that


revenge was expected by Elizabethan society. Although they loved to


see it in plays, it was considered sinful and it was utterly


condemned.


The Spanish Tragedy written by Thomas Kyd was an excellent


example of a revenge tragedy. With this play, Elizabethan theater


received its first great revenge tragedy, and because of the success


of this play, the dramatic form had to be imitated. The play was


performed from 1587 to 1589 and it gave people an everlasting


remembrance of the story of a father who avenges the murder of his


son. In this story, a man named Andrea is killed by Balthazar in the


heat of battle. The death was considered by Elizabethan people as a


fair one, therefore a problem occurred when Andrea s ghost appeared to


seek vengeance on its killer. Kyd seemed to have used this to parallel


a ghost named Achilles in Seneca s play Troades. Andrea s ghost comes


and tells his father, Hieronimo that he must seek revenge. Hieronimo


does not know who killed his son but he goes to find out. During his


investigation, he receives a letter saying that Lorenzo killed his


son, but he doubts this so he runs to the king for justice. Hieronimo


importantly secures his legal rights before taking justice into his


own hands. The madness scene comes into effect when Hieronimo s wife,


Usable goes mad, and Hieronimo is so stunned that his mind becomes


once again unsettled. Finally Hieronimo decides to go through with the


revenge, so he seeks out to murder Balthazar and Lorenzo, which he


successfully does. Hieronimo becomes a blood thirsty maniac and when


the king calls for his arrest, he commits suicide.


As well as the fact that Elizabethan theater had its rules


about how a revenge tragedy had to be, so did Thomas Kyd. He came up


with the Kydian Formula to distinguish revenge tragedies from other


plays. His first point was that the fundamental motive was revenge,


and the revenge is aided by an accomplice who both commit suicide


after the revenge is achieved. The ghost of the slain watches the


revenge on the person who killed him. The revenger goes through


justifiable hesitation before committing to revenge as a solution.


Madness occurs due to the grieve of a loss. Intrigue is used against


<
p>and by the revenger. There is bloody action and many deaths that


occur throughout the entire play. The accomplices on both sides are


killed. The villain is full of villainous devices. The revenge is


accomplished terribly and fittingly. The final point that Thomas Kyd


made about his play was that minor characters are left to deal with


the situation at the end of the play.


The Spanish Tragedy follows these rules made by Kyd very


closely, simply because Kyd developed these rules from the play. The


fundamental motive was revenge because that was the central theme of


the play. The ghost of Andrea sees his father kill the men who


murdered Andrea originally. Hieronimo hesitates first because he goes


to the king and then he is faced with Isabella s madness which is


caused by Andrea s death. The play is filled with all kinds of bloody


action and many people die throughout the course of the play. The


accomplices in the play also all end up dead. Lorenzo who is the true


villain, is full of all kinds of evil villainous devices. The revenge


works out perfectly, in that both Lorenzo and Balthazar get murdered


in the end by Hieronimo. The minor characters were left to clean up


the mess of all of the deaths that occurred during the play. The


Spanish Tragedy also follows the conventions of Elizabethan theater


very closely. The murder was committed and Hieronimo had to take


justice into his own hands, because true justice just simply wasn t


available. Hieronimo then delays his revenge for many different


reasons that occur in the play. The ghost of Andrea appeared and


guided Hieronimo to the direction of his killer. Also at the end of


the play, both Hieronimo and his accomplices die after they were


successful in committing the revenge.


In Hamlet, Shakespeare follows regular convention for a large


part of the play. In the beginning, Shakespeare sets up the scene,


having a ghost on a dark night. Everyone is working and something


strange is happening in Denmark. It is as if Shakespeare is saying


that some kind of foul play has been committed. This sets up for the


major theme in the play which is of course revenge. The ghost appears


to talk to Hamlet. It is quite obvious that the play had a gruesome,


violent death and the sexual aspect of the play was clearly introduced


when Claudius married Hamlet s mother Gertrude. The ghost tells Hamlet


that he has been given the role of the person who will take revenge


upon Claudius. Hamlet must now think of how to take revenge on


Claudius, although he doesn t know what to do about it. He ponders his


thoughts for a long period of time, expecting to do the deed


immediately, but instead he drags it on until the end of the play.


Although what was important to note was that all tragic heroes of


plays at that time delayed their actual revenge until the end of the


play. In most revenge plays, the revenger was often anonymous and well


disguised, stalking the enemy about to be killed, but Hamlet started a


battle of wits with Claudius by acting mad and calling it his antic


disposition , although the whole thing was a ploy to get closer to


Claudius to be able to avenge his father s death more easily. The


tactic was a disadvantage in that it drew all attention upon himself.


More importantly though it was an advantage that his antic


disposition , isolated him from the rest of the court because of the


people not paying attention to what he thought or did because of his


craziness.


One important part of all revenge plays is that after the


revenge is finally decided upon, the tragic hero delays the actual


revenge until the end of the play. Hamlet s delay of killing Claudius


takes on three distinct stages. Firstly he had to prove that the ghost


was actually telling the truth, and he did this by staging the play


The Mousetrap at court. When Claudius stormed out in rage, Hamlet


knew that he was guilty. The second stage was when Hamlet could have


killed Claudius while he was confessing to god. If Hamlet had done it


here then Claudius would have gone to heaven because he confessed


while Hamlet s father was in purgatory because he did not get the


opportunity to confess. So Hamlet therefore decided not to murder


Claudius at this point in the play. The third delay was the fact that


he got side tracked. He accidentally killed Polonius which created a


whole new problem with the fact that Laertes now wanted Hamlet dead.


After he commit this murder he was also sent off and unable to see the


king for another few weeks until he could finally do the job. What


makes Hamlet stand out from many other revenge plays of the period is


not that it rejects the conventions of its genre but that it both


enacts and analyses them.


It can be easily understood that Hamlet very closely follows


the regular conventions for all Elizabethan tragedies. First Hamlet is


faced with the fact that he has to avenge the murder of his father and


since there is no fair justice available, he must take the law into


his own hands. The ghost of his father appears to guide Hamlet to


Claudius and inform Hamlet of the evil that Claudius has committed.


Then Hamlet constantly delays his revenge and always finds a way to


put it off until he finally does it in Act V, Scene 2. Hamlet at the


same time continues to keep a close relationship with the audience


with his seven main soliloquies including the famous, To be, or not


to be… (Act 3 Scene 1). The play also consists of a mad scene where


Ophelia has gone mad because her father Polonius had been killed and


because Hamlet was sent off to England. The sexual aspect of the play


was brought in when Claudius married Gertrude after he had dreadfully


killed Old Hamlet and taken his throne. Hamlet also follows almost


every aspect of Thomas Kyd s formula for a revenge tragedy. The only


point that can be argued is that the accomplices on both sides were


not killed because at the end of the play, Horatio was the only one to


survive, although if it wasn t for Hamlet, Horatio would have commit


suicide when he said, I am more an antique Roman than a Dane. Here s


some liquor left. (Act V Scene 2, 346-347). If Horatio had killed


himself, then Hamlet would have followed the Kydian formula as well as


the regular conventions for Elizabethan revenge tragedy.


Hamlet is definitely a great example of a typical revenge


tragedy of the Elizabethan theater era. It followed every convention


required to classify it as a revenge play quite perfectly. Hamlet is


definitely one of the greatest revenge stories ever written and it was


all influenced first by Sophocles, Euripides and other Greeks, and


then more importantly by Seneca. Hamlet as well as The Spanish Tragedy


tackled and conquered all areas that were required for the


consummation of a great revenge tragedy. Revenge although thought to


be unlawful and against the Church was absolutely adored by all


Elizabethan people. The Elizabethan audience always insisted on


seeing eventual justice, and one who stained his hands with blood had


to pay the penalty. That no revenger, no matter how just, ever wholly


escapes the penalty for shedding blood, even in error. This was also


a very important point that was also dealt with brilliantly by


Shakespeare in finding a way to kill Hamlet justly even though he was


required to kill Claudius. Hamlet was written with the mighty pen of


Shakespeare who once again shows people that he can conjure up any


play and make it one of the greatest of all time. Hamlet was one of


the greatest of all time.

Сохранить в соц. сетях:
Обсуждение:
comments powered by Disqus

Название реферата: Hamlet 3 Essay Research Paper Elizabethan Revenge

Слов:2805
Символов:18142
Размер:35.43 Кб.